Bahrs Christian, Rolauffs Bernd, Südkamp Norbert P, Schmal Hagen, Eingartner Christoph, Dietz Klaus, Pereira Philippe L, Weise Kuno, Lingenfelter Erich, Helwig Peter
Klinik für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, BG-Unfallklinik Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Apr 2;10:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-33.
Precise indications for computed tomography (CT) in proximal humeral fractures are not established. The purpose of this study was a comparison of conventional radiographic views with different CT reconstructions with 2 D and 3 D imaging to establish indications for additional CT diagnostics depending on the fractured parts.
In a prospective diagnostic study in two level 1 trauma centers, 44 patients with proximal humeral fractures were diagnosed with conventional X-rays (22 AP + axillary views, 22 AP + scapular Y-views) and CT (multi-planar reconstruction (MPR) and maximum intensity projection (MIP)) with 2 D and 3 D imaging. 3 observers assessed the technical image quality, the assessment of the relevant anatomical structures (2-sample-t-test) and the percentage of the osseous overlap of the proximal humerus (Welch-test) using a scoring system. The quality of the different diagnostic methods was assessed according to the number of fractured parts (Bonferroni-Holm adjustment).
There was significantly more overlap of the fractured region on the scapular Y-views (mean 71.5%, range 45-90%) than on axillary views (mean 56.2%, range 10.5-100%). CT-diagnostics allowed a significantly better assessment of the relevant structures than conventional diagnostics (p < 0.05) independently of the fracture severity (two-, three-, and four-part fractures).
Conventional X-rays with AP view and a high-quality axillary view are useful for primary diagnostics of the fracture and often but not always show a clear presentation of the relevant bony structures such as both tuberosities, the glenoid and humeral head. CT with thin slices technology and additional 3 D imaging provides always a clear presentation of the fractured region. Clinically, a CT should be performed--independently of the number of fractured parts--when the proximal humerus and the shoulder joint are not presented with sufficient X-ray-quality to establish a treatment plan.
肱骨近端骨折中计算机断层扫描(CT)的精确指征尚未确定。本研究的目的是比较传统X线片与不同CT重建的二维和三维成像,以根据骨折部位确定额外CT诊断的指征。
在两个一级创伤中心进行的一项前瞻性诊断研究中,44例肱骨近端骨折患者接受了传统X线检查(22例前后位+腋位片,22例前后位+肩胛Y位片)以及CT检查(多平面重建(MPR)和最大密度投影(MIP))的二维和三维成像。3名观察者使用评分系统评估技术图像质量、相关解剖结构的评估(双样本t检验)以及肱骨近端骨重叠的百分比(韦尔奇检验)。根据骨折部位数量评估不同诊断方法的质量(邦费罗尼-霍尔姆校正)。
肩胛Y位片上骨折区域的重叠明显多于腋位片(平均71.5%,范围45 - 90%),腋位片上平均为56.2%(范围10.5 - 100%)。与传统诊断相比,CT诊断能够显著更好地评估相关结构(p < 0.05),且与骨折严重程度(二部分、三部分和四部分骨折)无关。
前后位片和高质量腋位片的传统X线检查对骨折的初步诊断有用,且常常但并非总是能清晰显示相关骨结构,如两个结节、关节盂和肱骨头。薄层CT技术及额外的三维成像总能清晰显示骨折区域。临床上,当肱骨近端和肩关节的X线质量不足以制定治疗方案时,无论骨折部位数量多少,都应进行CT检查。