Kayes Nicola M, Schluter Philip J, McPherson Kathryn M, Leete Marta, Mawston Grant, Taylor Denise
School of Rehabilitation and Occupation Studies, Health and Rehabilitation Research Centre, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Apr;90(4):594-601. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.10.012.
To assess the feasibility, acceptability, and psychometric properties of Actical accelerometers in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).
Participants attended 2 testing sessions 7 days apart in which they completed 6 activities ranging in intensity while wearing an Actical accelerometer and Polar heart rate monitor. Perceived exertion was recorded after each activity.
University research center.
People (N=31) with a definite diagnosis of MS were purposefully selected, aiming for diversity in level of reported disability, age, sex, and type of MS.
Not applicable.
Actical accelerometer, Polar S810i and RS800sd heart rate monitors, Borg rating of perceived exertion, six-minute walk test (6MWT), 30-second chair stand test.
Accelerometers had good feasibility and acceptability in people with MS. Test-retest reliability was poor for sedentary and free-living activities, with low to moderate intraclass correlation coefficients (.00-.75), but was better for more vigorous or rhythmic activities (.85-.90). Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement for average accelerometer counts were wide, ranging from +/-16 (newspaper reading) to +/-1330 (6MWT). Validity was not established with 95% prediction intervals showing high variability for all activities.
The psychometric problems highlighted here suggest Actical accelerometers should be used with caution in people with MS as a measure of physical activity, particularly when measuring comparatively sedentary or free-living activities.
评估Actical加速度计在多发性硬化症(MS)患者中的可行性、可接受性及心理测量特性。
参与者相隔7天参加2次测试,期间佩戴Actical加速度计和Polar心率监测仪完成6项强度各异的活动。每项活动后记录主观用力感觉。
大学研究中心。
特意选取确诊为MS的患者(N = 31),目标是在报告的残疾程度、年龄、性别及MS类型方面实现多样化。
不适用。
Actical加速度计、Polar S810i和RS800sd心率监测仪、Borg主观用力感觉评分、六分钟步行试验(6MWT)、30秒椅子站立试验。
加速度计在MS患者中具有良好的可行性和可接受性。久坐和日常活动的重测信度较差,组内相关系数低至中等(0.00 - 0.75),但在强度更大或有节奏的活动中表现较好(0.85 - 0.90)。加速度计平均计数的Bland - Altman 95%一致性界限较宽,范围从±16(读报)到±1330(6MWT)。所有活动的95%预测区间显示高度变异性,因此未确立效度。
此处突出的心理测量问题表明,在MS患者中使用Actical加速度计作为身体活动的测量工具时应谨慎,尤其是在测量相对久坐或日常活动时。