Rothen Nicolas, Meier Beat
Department of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2009;4(4):e5037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005037. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
Some studies, most of them case-reports, suggest that synesthetes have an advantage in visual search and episodic memory tasks. The goal of this study was to examine this hypothesis in a group study.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In the present study, we tested thirteen grapheme-color synesthetes and we compared their performance on a visual search task and a memory test to an age-, handedness-, education-, and gender-matched control group. The results showed no significant group differences (all relevant ps>.50). For the visual search task effect sizes indicated a small advantage for synesthetes (Cohen's d between .19 and .32). No such advantage was found for episodic memory (Cohen's d<.05).
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The results indicate that synesthesia per se does not seem to lead to a strong performance advantage. Rather, the superior performance of synesthetes observed in some case-report studies may be due to individual differences, to a selection bias or to a strategic use of synesthesia as a mnemonic. In order to establish universal effects of synesthesia on cognition single-case studies must be complemented by group studies.
一些研究(其中大部分是病例报告)表明,联觉者在视觉搜索和情景记忆任务中具有优势。本研究的目的是在一项群体研究中检验这一假设。
方法/主要发现:在本研究中,我们测试了13名 grapheme - color 联觉者,并将他们在视觉搜索任务和记忆测试中的表现与一个年龄、利手、教育程度和性别匹配的对照组进行了比较。结果显示两组之间没有显著差异(所有相关 p 值>.50)。对于视觉搜索任务,效应量表明联觉者有小的优势(科恩 d 值在.19 到.32 之间)。情景记忆方面未发现此类优势(科恩 d 值<.05)。
结论/意义:结果表明,联觉本身似乎并不会带来强大的表现优势。相反,在一些病例报告研究中观察到的联觉者的卓越表现可能是由于个体差异、选择偏差或作为记忆术对联觉的策略性使用。为了确定联觉对认知的普遍影响,单病例研究必须辅以群体研究。