Douglas Pamela S, Chen Jersey, Gillam Linda, Hendel Robert, Hundley W Gregory, Masoudi Frederick, Patel Manesh R, Peterson Eric
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27715, USA.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Feb;2(2):231-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.11.012.
Despite rapid technologic advances and sustained growth, less attention has been focused on quality in imaging than in other areas of cardiovascular medicine. To address this deficit, representatives from cardiovascular imaging societies, private payers, government agencies, the medical imaging industry, and experts in quality measurement met in the second Quality in Cardiovascular Imaging Think Tank. The participants endorsed the previous consensus definition of quality in imaging and proposed quality measures. Additional areas of needed effort included data standardization and structured reporting, appropriateness criteria, imaging registries, laboratory accreditation, partnership development, and imaging research. The second American College of Cardiology-Duke University Think Tank continued the process of the development, dissemination, and adoption of quality improvement initiatives for all cardiovascular imaging modalities.
尽管技术进步迅速且持续增长,但与心血管医学的其他领域相比,成像质量受到的关注较少。为了弥补这一不足,心血管成像协会、私人医保机构、政府机构、医学成像行业的代表以及质量测量专家齐聚第二届心血管成像质量智库会议。与会者认可了先前关于成像质量的共识定义,并提出了质量衡量标准。其他需要努力的领域包括数据标准化和结构化报告、适宜性标准、成像登记系统、实验室认证、合作关系发展以及成像研究。第二届美国心脏病学会 - 杜克大学智库会议继续推进针对所有心血管成像模式的质量改进举措的制定、传播和采用。