Esere Mary Ogechi
Department of Guidance and Counselling, University of Ilorin, Nigeria.
Afr Health Sci. 2008 Jun;8(2):120-5.
Adolescents display sexual behaviours and developmental characteristics that place them at risk for Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs). Because young people experiment sexually and because of the consequences of indiscriminate sexual activities on the youth, there is the need to mount sex education programmes that are geared towards enlightenment and appropriate education about sex and sexuality.
To determine whether Sex Education Intervention Programme would reduce at-risk sexual behaviours of school-going adolescents.
Pre-test, post-test control group quasi-experimental design.
A randomly selected co-educational school in Ilorin Metropolis, Nigeria.
24 school-going adolescents aged 13-19 years.
Sex Education Programme (treatment group) versus Control programme (placebo).
Self-reported exposure to sexually transmitted diseases, multiple sex partners, anal sex, oral sex, non use of condom.
When the treatment (intervention) group was compared with the control group in an intention to treat analysis, there were significant differences in at-risk sexual behaviours of the two groups. Those in the intervention group reported less at-risk sexual behaviours than their counterparts in the control group. The treatment group evaluated the intervention programme positively and their knowledge of sexual health improved. Lack of behavioural effect on the control group could be linked to differential quality of delivery of intervention.
Compared with the control group, this specially designed intervention sex education programme reduced at-risk sexual behaviour in adolescents. Based on this finding, it was recommended that sex education be introduced into the curriculum of secondary school education in Nigeria.
青少年表现出的性行为和发育特征使他们面临感染性传播疾病(STD)的风险。由于年轻人会进行性尝试,且随意性行为会给年轻人带来各种后果,因此有必要开展旨在普及性知识和进行适当性教育的性教育项目。
确定性教育干预项目是否能减少在校青少年的危险性行为。
前测、后测对照组准实验设计。
在尼日利亚伊洛林市随机选取的一所男女同校学校。
24名年龄在13 - 19岁的在校青少年。
性教育项目(治疗组)与对照项目(安慰剂组)。
自我报告的性传播疾病感染情况、多个性伴侣、肛交、口交、不使用避孕套情况。
在意向性分析中,将治疗(干预)组与对照组进行比较时,两组在危险性行为方面存在显著差异。干预组报告的危险性行为比对照组少。治疗组对干预项目评价积极,他们的性健康知识有所提高。对照组缺乏行为效果可能与干预实施的质量差异有关。
与对照组相比,这种专门设计的干预性教育项目减少了青少年的危险性行为。基于这一发现,建议在尼日利亚的中学教育课程中引入性教育。