• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多支冠状动脉疾病的经皮与外科血管重建术:SOS试验患者的单中心10年随访

Percutaneous versus surgical revascularization for multivessel coronary artery disease: a single center 10 year follow-up of SOS trial patients.

作者信息

Buszman Pawel, Wiernek Szymon, Szymanski Radoslaw, Bialkowska Bozena, Buszman Piotr, Fil Wojciech, Stables Rodney, Bochenek Andrzej, Martin Jack, Tendera Michal

机构信息

Upper Silesian Medical Center, 45-47 Ziolowa, 40-635 Katowice, Poland.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Sep 1;74(3):420-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22015.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.22015
PMID:19360866
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare 10 year outcomes including death, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), repeat revascularization (RR), and severity of angina (CCS) after randomization to stent supported percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or surgical revascularization (CABG) in a single center participating in the SOS trial.

BACKGROUND

Randomized studies show increased RR following PCI, but otherwise similar results to CABG in selected mutlivessel disease patients with up to 5 year follow up. There is no 10 year data available.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The analysis involved 100 patients randomized into the SOS study in Poland.

RESULTS

Patients were well matched for baseline demographic and angiographic characteristics. During 9.6 +/- 0.85 year observation, there was no significant difference between groups for survival, CCS, and LVEF. Increased RR occurred following PCI; 21 (42%) vs. 9 (18%), P < 0.05. As a consequence, the MACCE was also significantly higher following PCI; 36 (72%) vs. 28 (56%), P < 0.05. Excess RR predominantly occurred in the first year and diminished over time with numerically less RR following PCI from year 5 to 10; 2 (4%) vs. 7 (14%), P = ns.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that patients with multivessel coronary artery disease technically suitable for either stent supported PCI or CABG have very similar 10 year outcomes with respect to mortality, angina class, LVEF, and MACCE other than RR. Excess RR following PCI predominantly occurs in early years and is numerically lower following PCI in years 5-10. This underscores the need for longer-term follow up from randomized trials.

摘要

目的

在参与SOS试验的单一中心,比较随机接受支架辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)或外科血运重建(冠状动脉旁路移植术,CABG)后10年的结局,包括死亡、左心室射血分数(LVEF)、主要不良心血管和脑血管事件(MACCE)、再次血运重建(RR)以及心绞痛严重程度(加拿大心血管学会分级,CCS)。

背景

随机研究显示,PCI后RR增加,但在入选的多支血管病变患者中,随访长达5年时,PCI与CABG的结果在其他方面相似。尚无10年的数据。

材料与方法

分析纳入了波兰SOS研究中随机分组的100例患者。

结果

患者在基线人口统计学和血管造影特征方面匹配良好。在9.6±0.85年的观察期内,两组在生存率、CCS和LVEF方面无显著差异。PCI后RR增加;分别为21例(42%)和9例(18%),P<0.05。因此,PCI后的MACCE也显著更高;分别为36例(72%)和28例(56%),P<0.05。RR增加主要发生在第一年,随着时间推移逐渐减少,从第5年到第10年,PCI后的RR在数值上更少;分别为2例(4%)和7例(14%),P=无显著性差异。

结论

这些发现表明,技术上适合支架辅助PCI或CABG的多支血管冠状动脉疾病患者,在死亡率、心绞痛分级、LVEF和MACCE方面,除RR外,10年结局非常相似。PCI后RR增加主要发生在早期,在第5 - 10年,PCI后的RR在数值上更低。这突出了随机试验进行长期随访的必要性。

相似文献

1
Percutaneous versus surgical revascularization for multivessel coronary artery disease: a single center 10 year follow-up of SOS trial patients.多支冠状动脉疾病的经皮与外科血管重建术:SOS试验患者的单中心10年随访
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Sep 1;74(3):420-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22015.
2
2-year results of the AUTAX (Austrian Multivessel TAXUS-Stent) registry beyond the SYNTAX (synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXUS and cardiac surgery) study.超越SYNTAX(TAXUS药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与心脏手术协同作用)研究的奥地利多支血管TAXUS支架(AUTAX)注册研究的2年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Aug;2(8):718-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.05.019.
3
Multiarterial grafts improve the rate of early major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in patients undergoing coronary revascularization: analysis of 12 615 patients with multivessel disease.多动脉旁路移植可改善多支血管病变患者冠状动脉血运重建术后早期主要心脏和脑血管不良事件的发生率:12615 例患者分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Oct 1;52(4):746-752. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx171.
4
The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Study: 5-year follow-up of revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients with multivessel disease.Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Study:5 年随访:多血管病变糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术血运重建的比较。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2010 Jan;11(1):26-33. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328330ea32.
5
Prognosis of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafts for ostial right coronary lesions in propensity-matched individuals.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗吻合口右冠状动脉病变的倾向性匹配个体的预后。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2011 Dec;29(6):395-403. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5922.2010.00219.x. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
6
Revascularization in severe left ventricular dysfunction: outcome comparison of drug-eluting stent implantation versus coronary artery by-pass grafting.严重左心室功能不全的血运重建:药物洗脱支架植入与冠状动脉旁路移植术的疗效比较
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Jul 1;70(1):26-33. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21072.
7
Left Main Stenting in Comparison With Surgical Revascularization: 10-Year Outcomes of the (Left Main Coronary Artery Stenting) LE MANS Trial.左主干支架置入术与外科血运重建术的比较:(左主干冠状动脉支架置入术)勒芒试验的10年结果
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb 22;9(4):318-327. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.044.
8
Isolated disease of the proximal left anterior descending artery comparing the effectiveness of percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary artery bypass surgery.孤立性左前降支近端病变:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术疗效比较
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Oct;1(5):483-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.07.001.
9
Five-year outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention compared to bypass surgery in patients with multivessel disease involving the proximal left anterior descending artery: an ARTS-II sub-study.多支血管病变患者中累及左前降支近端的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与旁路手术的 5 年结果比较:ARTS-II 亚研究。
EuroIntervention. 2011 Apr;6(9):1060-7. doi: 10.4244/EIJV6I9A185.
10
Coronary artery bypass grafting vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with three-vessel disease: final five-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对三血管病变患者的比较:SYNTAX 试验的最终五年随访结果。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 21;35(40):2821-30. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu213. Epub 2014 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Ten-year outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel or left main coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.多支血管病变或左主干冠状动脉疾病行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗 10 年的结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Feb 2;18(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13019-023-02101-y.
2
Secondary prevention of ischaemic cardiac events.缺血性心脏事件的二级预防。
BMJ Clin Evid. 2011 Aug 30;2011:0206.