Department of Pathology, Instituto de Patología e Investigación, Universidad Nacional, Asunción, Paraguay.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2009 Jul;33(7):1049-57. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31819d17eb.
A concern of surgical oncologists has been to find a method to select patients for groin dissection in penile carcinomas considering the high morbidity of this procedure. A promising methodology, in the identification of early metastatic foci by the sentinel lymph node technique (initiated in Paraguay in the 1970s), was found, using a static anatomic approach, to be associated with a recurrence rate of 30%. Later, a dynamic method using radioactive tracers and peritumoral dye injection was introduced with an improvement in patients' outcome. Recurrences, however, remained high in most studies at a rate of about 15% to 20% except in few highly specialized centers with failure rates of 5%. The technical sophistication, lack of multicenter reproduction, and cost of dynamic sentinel node biopsies preclude their routine implementation in developing countries and other approaches are necessary. Because histologic grade, depth of tumor infiltration, and perineural invasion (PNI) are considered among the most important pathologic prognostic parameters in penile cancer, we devised a Prognostic Index combining these 3 factors. In this study, we are evaluating the incidence of nodal metastasis according to the Prognostic Index score. Pathologic materials from 193 patients with penectomy/circumcision and bilateral groin dissections for invasive squamous cell carcinoma were analyzed. The Prognostic Index (ranging from 2 to 7) consisted in the addition of numerical values given to histologic grade (1 to 3), deepest anatomic level involved by cancer (1 to 3), and presence of PNI (0 or 1). Histologic grades were defined as follows: grade 1, carcinomas with minimal to no atypias; grade 3, tumors showing any proportion of anaplastic cells; and grade 2, the remainder tumors. The anatomic levels and their numerical values were: in glans, lamina propria, 1; corpus spongiosum, 2; and corpus cavernosum, 3. In foreskin they were: lamina propria, 1; dartos, 2; and skin, 3. PNI was evaluated as follows: absence of PNI, 0; presence of PNI, 1. Penile intraepithelial neoplasia (carcinoma in situ), or index 1, was excluded from the study. Mean follow-up obtained in all patients was of 81 months. The distribution of cases and rate of metastasis according to index scores were: 2 (1 case), no metastasis; 3 (17 cases), no metastasis; 4 (35 cases), 20% of metastasis; 5 50 cases), 50% of metastasis; 6 (47 cases), 66% of metastasis; and 7 (43 cases), 79% of metastasis. On logistic regression analysis evaluating various pathologic factors, Prognostic Index scores were found as the best predictors of inguinal node metastasis and patients' survival. Inguinal node dissections might not be necessary for patients with low indices (2 and 3). Nodal dissections might be formally indicated for high-grade indexes (5 to 7). Patients with index 4 should be individually assessed for nodal dissection. If sentinel node biopsy cannot be performed for various reasons the Prognostic Index might represent a useful pathologic guide to the clinicians in the often difficult decision to perform an inguinal dissection or not.
手术肿瘤学家关注的一个问题是找到一种方法来选择阴茎癌患者进行腹股沟淋巴结清扫,因为这种手术的发病率很高。通过使用静态解剖方法,发现了一种有前途的方法,即通过前哨淋巴结技术(20 世纪 70 年代在巴拉圭开始)来识别早期转移灶,该方法与 30%的复发率相关联。后来,引入了一种使用放射性示踪剂和肿瘤周围染料注射的动态方法,改善了患者的预后。然而,除了少数高度专业化中心的失败率为 5%外,大多数研究中的复发率仍然很高,约为 15%至 20%。动态前哨淋巴结活检的技术复杂性、缺乏多中心复制和成本排除了它们在发展中国家和其他方法中的常规实施。由于组织学分级、肿瘤浸润深度和神经周围侵犯(PNI)被认为是阴茎癌最重要的病理预后参数之一,我们设计了一个结合这 3 个因素的预后指数。在这项研究中,我们根据预后指数评分评估淋巴结转移的发生率。分析了 193 例接受阴茎切除术/包皮环切术和双侧腹股沟淋巴结清扫术的浸润性鳞状细胞癌患者的病理材料。预后指数(范围为 2 至 7)由组织学分级(1 至 3)、癌症受累的最深解剖水平(1 至 3)和 PNI 存在情况(0 或 1)的数值相加组成。组织学分级定义如下:1 级,有最小至无非典型性的癌;3 级,肿瘤显示任何比例的间变细胞;2 级,其余肿瘤。解剖水平及其数值为:龟头,固有层,1;海绵体,2;和海绵体,3。在包皮中,它们分别为固有层,1;筋膜,2;和皮肤,3。PNI 的评估如下:无 PNI,0;存在 PNI,1。阴茎上皮内瘤变(原位癌)或指数 1 排除在研究之外。所有患者的平均随访时间为 81 个月。根据指数评分的病例分布和转移率如下:2(1 例),无转移;3(17 例),无转移;4(35 例),20%转移;5(50 例),50%转移;6(47 例),66%转移;7(43 例),79%转移。在评估各种病理因素的逻辑回归分析中,发现预后指数评分是腹股沟淋巴结转移和患者生存的最佳预测因子。对于低指数(2 和 3)的患者,可能不需要进行腹股沟淋巴结清扫术。对于高分级指数(5 至 7),可以正式进行淋巴结清扫术。指数为 4 的患者应单独评估淋巴结清扫术。如果由于各种原因无法进行前哨淋巴结活检,那么预后指数可能代表临床医生在是否进行腹股沟清扫术这一困难决策中的有用病理指导。