Suppr超能文献

通过提供针对性的护理包,降低高危老年内科患者出院后30天内的医院再入院率或急诊科就诊率。

Reduction of 30-day postdischarge hospital readmission or emergency department (ED) visit rates in high-risk elderly medical patients through delivery of a targeted care bundle.

作者信息

Koehler Bruce E, Richter Kathleen M, Youngblood Liz, Cohen Brian A, Prengler Irving D, Cheng Dunlei, Masica Andrew L

机构信息

Institute for Health Care Research and Improvement, Baylor Health Care System, 8080 North Central Expressway, Dallas, TX 75206, USA..

出版信息

J Hosp Med. 2009 Apr;4(4):211-8. doi: 10.1002/jhm.427.

Abstract

RATIONALE

Care coordination has shown inconsistent results as a mechanism to reduce hospital readmission and postdischarge emergency department (ED) visit rates.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of a supplemental care bundle targeting high-risk elderly inpatients implemented by hospital-based staff compared to usual care on a composite outcome of hospital readmission and/or ED visitation at 30 and 60 days following discharge.

PATIENTS/METHODS: Randomized controlled pilot study in 41 medical inpatients predisposed to unplanned readmission or postdischarge ED visitation, conducted at Baylor University Medical Center. The intervention group care bundle consisted of medication counseling/reconciliation by a clinical pharmacist (CP), condition specific education/enhanced discharge planning by a care coordinator (CC), and phone follow-up.

RESULTS

Groups had similar baseline characteristics. Intervention group readmission/ED visit rates were reduced at 30 days compared to the control group (10.0% versus 38.1%, P = 0.04), but not at 60 days (30.0% versus 42.9%, P = 0.52). For those patients who had a readmission/postdischarge ED visit, the time interval to this event was longer in the intervention group compared to usual care (36.2 versus 15.7 days, P = 0.05). Study power was insufficient to reliably compare the effects of the intervention on lengths of index hospital stay between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A targeted care bundle delivered to high-risk elderly inpatients decreased unplanned acute health care utilization up to 30 days following discharge. Dissipation of this effect by 60 days postdischarge defines reasonable expectations for analogous hospital-based educational interventions. Further research is needed regarding the impacts of similar care bundles in larger populations across a variety of inpatient settings.

摘要

原理

作为一种降低医院再入院率和出院后急诊就诊率的机制,护理协调的效果并不一致。

目的

评估与常规护理相比,由医院工作人员实施的针对高危老年住院患者的补充护理套餐对出院后30天和60天的医院再入院和/或急诊就诊综合结果的影响。

患者/方法:在贝勒大学医学中心对41名易发生计划外再入院或出院后急诊就诊的内科住院患者进行随机对照试验研究。干预组护理套餐包括临床药剂师(CP)进行的药物咨询/核对、护理协调员(CC)进行的特定病情教育/强化出院计划以及电话随访。

结果

两组基线特征相似。干预组30天时的再入院/急诊就诊率低于对照组(10.0%对38.1%,P = 0.04),但60天时并非如此(30.0%对42.9%,P = 0.52)。对于那些有再入院/出院后急诊就诊的患者,干预组发生该事件的时间间隔比常规护理组更长(36.2天对15.7天,P = 0.05)。研究效能不足以可靠地比较干预对两组患者首次住院时长的影响。

结论

针对高危老年住院患者的定向护理套餐可降低出院后30天内计划外急性医疗保健的利用率。出院60天时这种效果的消散为类似的基于医院的教育干预设定了合理预期。需要进一步研究类似护理套餐在不同住院环境下对更大人群的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验