Kuhl Emily A, Sears Samuel F, Vazquez Lauren D, Conti Jamie B
American Psychiatric Institute for Research and Education, Division of Research, American Psychiatric Association, Arlington, Virginia 22209, USA.
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009 May-Jun;24(3):225-31. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e31819c143d.
Patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are at risk for postimplant anxiety. Computerized treatments for anxiety are well supported and desirable because of accessibility, anonymity, and cost-effectiveness. However, there currently exists no computerized psychosocial treatment for ICD populations. Our objective was to evaluate whether a pilot program (patient-assisted computerized education for recipients of ICDs [PACER of ICDs]) of a computerized intervention for ICD patients would improve ICD-related knowledge and psychological outcomes versus usual care. Outcomes were also compared with those from a related study that used the same intervention but in an in-person format.
Patients (N = 30) with an ICD were randomized to PACER or usual care. Mean time from implantation was 10.71 months (SD, 21.81 months). Outcomes included ICD-related knowledge, trait anxiety, defibrillation-related anxiety, patient acceptance of the ICD, and quality of life. Patients were assessed at baseline and at 1 month follow-up.
Knowledge score over time did not differ by treatment group, although both groups improved their scores. Among treatment patients, increased knowledge accounted for a significant amount of variance in device acceptance (R2 change = 0.30, P =.02), irrespective of age, education, ejection fraction, and time from implantation. There was no relationship between knowledge and device acceptance among control patients. Compared with previous recipients, new device recipients (< 3 months) were more likely to demonstrate an increase in knowledge (P =.01), greater defibrillation anxiety (P =.02), and worse patient acceptance (P =.04). Patient-assisted computerized education for recipients of ICDs resulted in comparable improvements in trait anxiety, quality of life, and device acceptance as the in-person treatment. The potential utility of PACER to enhance device acceptance lends support for further testing among larger samples.
植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)患者存在植入后焦虑风险。由于可及性、匿名性和成本效益,焦虑的计算机化治疗得到了充分支持且备受青睐。然而,目前尚无针对ICD人群的计算机化心理社会治疗方法。我们的目的是评估一项针对ICD患者的计算机化干预试点项目(ICD接受者的患者辅助计算机化教育[ICD的PACER])与常规护理相比,是否能改善与ICD相关的知识及心理结果。还将结果与一项相关研究进行了比较,该研究使用了相同的干预措施,但采用的是面对面形式。
30例植入ICD的患者被随机分为PACER组或常规护理组。距植入的平均时间为10.71个月(标准差,21.81个月)。结果包括与ICD相关的知识、特质焦虑、除颤相关焦虑、患者对ICD的接受程度以及生活质量。在基线和随访1个月时对患者进行评估。
尽管两组的知识得分均有所提高,但随时间推移,治疗组之间的知识得分并无差异。在治疗患者中,知识的增加在设备接受度方面解释了显著的方差量(R2变化 = 0.30,P = 0.02),与年龄、教育程度、射血分数和植入时间无关。对照组患者的知识与设备接受度之间没有关系。与先前接受者相比,新设备接受者(<3个月)更有可能表现出知识增加(P = 0.01)、更大的除颤焦虑(P = 0.02)和更差的患者接受度(P = 0.04)。ICD接受者的患者辅助计算机化教育在特质焦虑、生活质量和设备接受度方面的改善与面对面治疗相当。PACER提高设备接受度的潜在效用为在更大样本中进行进一步测试提供了支持。