Massachusetts General Hospital, ACC 739A, MGH, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Neurocrit Care. 2009;11(2):272-5. doi: 10.1007/s12028-009-9220-1. Epub 2009 Apr 24.
Ancillary testing is frequently required in the determination of death by brain criteria, particularly in cases in which the clinical examination is drawn into question. Newer tests, such as computed tomographic angiography (CTA), have garnered enthusiasm for their ease of performance, but have not been validated as acceptable tests compared with a gold standard.
We present a case of a 31-year-old patient who was felt to have cerebral circulatory arrest on CTA, but was subsequently found to have evidence of preserved cerebral blood flow on transcranial Doppler, thus precluding the diagnosis death by brain criteria.
CTA is not a validated confirmatory test for cerebral circulatory arrest in brain death, and may be falsely positive.
CTA should be studied further in comparison to validated tests, such as conventional angiography or single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), before being accepted as a standard ancillary test in determining death by brain criteria.
在脑死亡标准的判定中,辅助检查通常是必需的,尤其是在临床检查受到质疑的情况下。一些新的检查,如计算机断层血管造影(CTA),因其易于操作而受到关注,但尚未与金标准相比被验证为可接受的检查。
我们报告了一例 31 岁的患者,其 CTA 检查提示脑循环停止,但随后经颅多普勒检查发现有脑血流保留的证据,从而排除了脑死亡标准判定的死亡诊断。
CTA 不是脑死亡中脑循环停止的确认性验证检查,可能会出现假阳性。
在接受 CTA 作为脑死亡判定的标准辅助检查之前,应与传统血管造影或单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)等已验证的检查进行进一步研究。