Berzin Stephanie Cosner, Cohen Ed, Thomas Karen, Dawson William C
Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02467, USA.
Child Welfare. 2008;87(4):35-54.
This article describes the evaluation of two family group decision-making programs (FGDM; Fresno n = 60; Riverside n = 50) administered under the California Title IV-E Waiver Demonstration Project. This is the only evaluation using random assignment to examine FGDM. Overall, results did not indicate more positive outcomes for children receiving the intervention, but did indicate that children were not worse than those receiving traditional services; outcomes examined were related to child safety, placement stability, and permanence.
本文描述了在加利福尼亚州《第四类-E款豁免示范项目》下实施的两个家庭小组决策项目(FGDM;弗雷斯诺60例;里弗赛德50例)的评估情况。这是唯一一项采用随机分配来检验FGDM的评估。总体而言,结果并未表明接受干预的儿童有更积极的结果,但确实表明这些儿童并不比接受传统服务的儿童情况更糟;所考察的结果与儿童安全、安置稳定性和永久性有关。