Suppr超能文献

伐尼克兰:戒烟的一线治疗选择。

Varenicline: a first-line treatment option for smoking cessation.

作者信息

Garrison Gina Daubney, Dugan Sara E

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Albany, New York 12208-3492, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2009 Mar;31(3):463-91. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.03.021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Varenicline acts as a partial agonist/antagonist with affinity and selectivity for alpha(4) beta(2) nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. This activity at the nicotine-receptor level may help patients achieve smoking cessation by reducing cravings/withdrawal symptoms and smoking satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the literature on the pharmacologic properties, therapeutic efficacy, and tolerability of varenicline for smoking cessation.

METHODS

Pertinent controlled clinical trials, meta-analyses, meeting abstracts, case reports, and review articles published in English between 1966 and May 2008 were identified through searches of MEDLINE and OVID using the terms varenicline, smoking, tobacco cessation, and CP 526555.

RESULTS

Eight clinical trials were identified that compared <or=12 weeks of varenicline treatment with placebo and/or bupropion sustained release (SR); one of the trials reported follow-up data to 24 weeks, and the remainder reported data to 52 weeks. During treatment with oral varenicline titrated to 1 mg BID, CO-confirmed 4-week continuous quit rates/continuous abstinence rates (CQRs/CARs) in weeks 9 through 12 ranged from 43.9% (odds ratio [OR] = 3.85 [95% CI, 2.69-5.50; P < 0.001 vs placebo]; OR = 1.90 [95% CI, 1.38-2.62; P < 0.001 vs bupropion SR]) to 65.4% (OR = 2.98 [95% CI, 1.78-4.99; P < 0.001 vs placebo]). In 4 of these trials, varenicline 1 mg BID was associated with significantly higher CQRs/CARs compared with placebo at week-52 follow-up, ranging from 21.9% (P < 0.001) to 34.6% (P = 0.036). One trial reported a significantly higher CAR at 52 weeks with varenicline compared with bupropion SR (23.0% vs 14.6%, respectively; P = 0.004), and another reported a significantly higher CAR at 52 weeks with varenicline compared with nicotine replacement therapy (25.9% vs 19.8%, respectively; P = 0.040). In a relapse-prevention study that included a 12-week extension period for participants who were abstinent after the initial 12 weeks of treatment, CARs were significantly improved at 24 weeks with varenicline relative to placebo (70.5% vs 49.6%, respectively; OR = 2.48; 95% CI, 1.95-3.16; P < 0.001). Treatment with varenicline was generally well tolerated in study populations with no major comorbidities. In a pooled analysis of 2 Phase III trials, the most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) with varenicline, bupropion SR, and placebo were nausea (28.8%, 9.9%, and 9.1%, respectively), insomnia (14.2%, 21.5%, and 12.6%), and headache (14.2%, 11.1%, and 12.4%). In a pooled analysis of 2 identically designed Phase III trials, bupropion SR was associated with the highest overall rates of discontinuation due to all-cause AEs compared with varenicline and placebo (13.9%, 9.5%, and 8.2%, respectively) and due to AEs considered related to study drug (12.1%, 7.9%, and 6.4%). In double-blind clinical trials of varenicline, nausea was the most frequently reported AE (16.3%-41.9%). Varenicline treatment should begin 7 days before the proposed smoking quit date; dose titration is recommended to minimize dose-related nausea. Based on postmarketing reports of serious AEs in vareniclinetreated patients, caution is recommended when operating vehicles or heavy machinery. Patient education and monitoring for potential AEs are also recommended, particularly in patients with a history of psychiatric illness.

CONCLUSIONS

Varenicline has a unique mechanism of action compared with other first-line options for smoking cessation. Available clinical-trial data support its use as an effective and generally well-tolerated therapy for smoking cessation in healthy adult smokers, although there is a need for further efficacy and safety evaluation in the general population, particularly those with comorbid conditions.

摘要

背景

伐尼克兰作为一种对α4β2烟碱型乙酰胆碱受体具有亲和力和选择性的部分激动剂/拮抗剂。在尼古丁受体水平的这种活性可能通过减少渴望/戒断症状和吸烟满意度来帮助患者戒烟。

目的

本文综述了伐尼克兰用于戒烟的药理特性、治疗效果和耐受性的相关文献。

方法

通过使用术语伐尼克兰、吸烟、戒烟和CP 526555在MEDLINE和OVID中进行检索,确定了1966年至2008年5月间以英文发表的相关对照临床试验、荟萃分析、会议摘要、病例报告和综述文章。

结果

确定了八项临床试验,这些试验将≤12周的伐尼克兰治疗与安慰剂和/或安非他酮缓释剂进行了比较;其中一项试验报告了至24周的随访数据,其余试验报告了至52周的数据。在口服伐尼克兰滴定至1mg每日两次的治疗期间,第9至12周经一氧化碳确认的4周持续戒烟率/持续戒断率(CQRs/CARs)范围为43.9%(优势比[OR]=3.85[95%CI,2.69 - 5.50;与安慰剂相比P<0.001];OR = 1.90[95%CI,1.38 - 2.62;与安非他酮缓释剂相比P<0.001])至65.4%(OR = 2.98[95%CI,1.78 - 4.99;与安慰剂相比P<0.001])。在其中四项试验中,与安慰剂相比,伐尼克兰1mg每日两次在第52周随访时CQRs/CARs显著更高,范围为21.9%(P<0.001)至34.6%(P = 0.036)。一项试验报告伐尼克兰在52周时的CAR显著高于安非他酮缓释剂(分别为23.0%对14.6%;P = 0.004),另一项试验报告伐尼克兰在52周时的CAR显著高于尼古丁替代疗法(分别为25.9%对19.8%;P = 0.040)。在一项预防复发研究中,对于在初始12周治疗后戒烟的参与者有一个12周的延长期,与安慰剂相比,伐尼克兰在24周时CAR显著改善(分别为70.5%对49.6%;OR = 2.48;95%CI,1.95 - 3.16;P<0.001)。在没有主要合并症的研究人群中,伐尼克兰治疗总体耐受性良好。在两项III期试验的汇总分析中,伐尼克兰、安非他酮缓释剂和安慰剂最常报告的不良事件(AE)分别为恶心(分别为28.8%、9.9%和9.1%)、失眠(分别为14.2%、21.5%和12.6%)和头痛(分别为14.2%、11.1%和12.4%)。在两项设计相同的III期试验的汇总分析中,与伐尼克兰和安慰剂相比,安非他酮缓释剂因所有原因AE导致的总体停药率最高(分别为13.9%、9.5%和8.2%),因与研究药物相关的AE导致的停药率也最高(分别为12.1%、7.9%和6.4%)。在伐尼克兰的双盲临床试验中,恶心是最常报告的AE(16.3% - 41.9%)。伐尼克兰治疗应在拟议的戒烟日期前7天开始;建议进行剂量滴定以尽量减少与剂量相关的恶心。基于伐尼克兰治疗患者上市后严重AE的报告,在操作车辆或重型机械时建议谨慎。还建议对患者进行教育并监测潜在的AE,特别是有精神疾病史的患者。

结论

与其他戒烟一线选择相比,伐尼克兰具有独特的作用机制。现有的临床试验数据支持其作为健康成年吸烟者戒烟的有效且总体耐受性良好的疗法,尽管需要在一般人群中,特别是有合并症的人群中进一步评估其疗效和安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验