Suppr超能文献

术后12小时内单独及联合使用丁丙诺啡和吗啡静脉自控镇痛的效果:一项针对接受腹部手术的成年人的随机、双盲、四臂试验。

Effects of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with buprenorphine and morphine alone and in combination during the first 12 postoperative hours: a randomized, double-blind, four-arm trial in adults undergoing abdominal surgery.

作者信息

Oifa Stanislav, Sydoruk Tatiana, White Ian, Ekstein Margaret P, Marouani Nissim, Chazan Shoshana, Skornick Yehuda, Weinbroum Avi A

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2009 Mar;31(3):527-41. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.03.018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intense pain in the first 12 hours after major abdominal surgery requires the use of large amounts of analgesics, mainly opioids, which may produce undesirable effects. Buprenorphine (BUP) is not typically used intravenously in this setting, particularly in combination with morphine (MO), due to concerns that BUP might inhibit the analgesic effect of MO.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the analgesic effect of BUP and MO separately and in combination for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

METHODS

In this double-blind study, adult patients were randomized to receive 1 of 4 regimens for 12 hours: a basal BUP infusion (BUP-i) of 0.4 microg/kg/h + BUP boluses (BUP-b) of 0.15 microg/kg each; a basal MO infusion (MO-i) of 10 microg/kg/h + MO boluses (MO-b) of 5 microg/kg each; a basal BUP-i of 0.4 microg/kg/h + MO-b of 5 microg/kg each; or a basal MO-i of 10 microg/kg/h + BUP-b of 0.15 microg/kg each. Bolus doses were delivered by intravenous patient-controlled anesthesia, with a bolus lockout time of 7 minutes. Diclofenac 75 mg IM q6h was available as rescue pain medication. Every 15 minutes during the first 2 postoperative hours and hourly thereafter, patients used visual analog scales to rate their pain (from 0 = totally free of pain to 10 = unbearable pain), level of sedation (from 1 = totally awake to 10 = heavily sedated), and satisfaction with treatment (from 1 = totally unsatisfied to 10 = fully satisfied). Blood pressure, heart rate, respiration rate, and arterial blood oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) were monitored, and adverse effects reported by patients or noted by clinicians were recorded at the same times. Study end points included total opioid consumption (infusion + boluses), demand:delivery ratio, and use of rescue medication.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty patients (63 men, 57 women; age range, 21-80 years; weight range, 40-120 kg) were included in the study. Seventy-four percent had other mild, treated diseases (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class 2). Pain visual analog scale ratings were comparably high in all groups during the first 2 postoperative hours. Pain intensity ratings at 3 to 12 hours were significantly lower in those who received BUP-i + BUP-b compared with the other treatment groups (P = 0.018). The drug requirement during the postoperative period decreased significantly in all groups (P = 0.01); however, there was a significant difference between groups in the demand:delivery ratio at 3 to 12 hours (group * psydrug interaction, P = 0.026). The numerically lowest demand:delivery ratio was seen with BUP-i + BUP-b. BUP-i was associated with a significantly lower heart rate compared with the other groups (P = 0.027); there were no drug-related differences in respiration rate, SpO(2), or sedation. Patients' level of satisfaction with treatment was significantly higher in the group that received BUP-i + BUP-b compared with the other 3 groups (P < 0.001). Postoperative nausea and vomiting were mild and occurred at a similar incidence in all groups, as did rescue diclofenac use.

CONCLUSIONS

In these patients undergoing abdominal surgery, the BUP-i + BUP-b regimen controlled postoperative pain as well as did MO-i + MO-b or the combinations of BUP and MO. BUP neither inhibited the analgesia provided by MO nor induced undesired sedation or hemodynamic or respiratory effects.

摘要

背景

腹部大手术后的前12小时内,剧烈疼痛需要使用大量镇痛药,主要是阿片类药物,这可能会产生不良影响。由于担心丁丙诺啡(BUP)可能会抑制吗啡(MO)的镇痛效果,在这种情况下通常不静脉使用BUP,尤其是与MO联合使用时。

目的

本研究比较了BUP和MO单独使用及联合使用对腹部手术患者术后疼痛控制的镇痛效果。

方法

在这项双盲研究中,成年患者被随机分为4种方案中的1种,持续12小时:基础BUP输注(BUP-i)0.4μg/kg/h + 每次0.15μg/kg的BUP推注(BUP-b);基础MO输注(MO-i)10μg/kg/h + 每次5μg/kg的MO推注(MO-b);基础BUP-i 0.4μg/kg/h + 每次5μg/kg的MO-b;或基础MO-i 10μg/kg/h + 每次0.15μg/kg的BUP-b。推注剂量通过静脉自控镇痛给药,推注锁定时间为7分钟。75mg双氯芬酸肌内注射,每6小时1次,作为解救性镇痛药。术后前2小时每15分钟、此后每小时,患者使用视觉模拟量表对疼痛(从0 = 完全无痛到10 = 难以忍受的疼痛)、镇静程度(从1 = 完全清醒到10 = 深度镇静)和治疗满意度(从1 = 完全不满意到10 = 完全满意)进行评分。监测血压、心率、呼吸频率和动脉血氧饱和度(SpO₂),并记录患者报告或临床医生注意到的不良反应。研究终点包括阿片类药物总消耗量(输注 + 推注)、需求:给药比和解救药物的使用情况。

结果

120例患者(63例男性,57例女性;年龄范围21 - 80岁;体重范围40 - 120kg)纳入研究。74%患有其他轻度、已治疗的疾病(美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级为2级)。术后前2小时所有组的疼痛视觉模拟量表评分都相对较高。与其他治疗组相比,接受BUP-i + BUP-b的患者在术后3至12小时的疼痛强度评分显著更低(P = 0.018)。所有组术后期间的药物需求量均显著下降(P = 0.01);然而,各治疗组在术后3至12小时的需求:给药比存在显著差异(组*药物交互作用,P = 0.026)。BUP-i + BUP-b组的需求:给药比在数值上最低。与其他组相比,BUP-i组的心率显著更低(P = 0.027);呼吸频率、SpO₂或镇静程度方面无药物相关差异。与其他3组相比,接受BUP-i + BUP-b的患者对治疗的满意度显著更高(P < 0.001)。术后恶心和呕吐症状较轻,所有组的发生率相似,解救性双氯芬酸的使用情况也相似。

结论

在这些接受腹部手术的患者中,BUP-i + BUP-b方案控制术后疼痛的效果与MO-i + MO-b方案或BUP与MO的联合方案相当。BUP既不抑制MO提供的镇痛作用,也不引起不良的镇静或血流动力学及呼吸效应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验