Knight O'Rese J, Chang Robert T, Feuer William J, Budenz Donald L
Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami 33136, Florida, USA.
Ophthalmology. 2009 Jul;116(7):1271-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.032. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
To determine the agreement between peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements from Stratus time domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and Cirrus spectral domain OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) in normal subjects and subjects with glaucoma.
Evaluation of diagnostic test or technology.
A total of 130 eyes from 130 normal subjects and subjects with glaucoma were analyzed. The subjects were divided into groups by visual field criteria: normal (n = 29), glaucoma suspect (n = 12), mild glaucoma (n = 41), moderate glaucoma (n = 18), and severe glaucoma (n = 30).
Peripapillary RNFL thickness was measured with Stratus Fast RNFL and Cirrus 200 x 200 Optic Disc Scan on the same day in 1 eye of each subject to determine agreement. Two operators used the same instruments for all scans.
Student paired t testing, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analysis of RNFL thickness measurements.
The average age of the glaucoma group was significantly more than that of the normal group: 68.3+/-12.3 years versus 55.7+/-12.1 years, respectively. For Stratus OCT, the average RNFL thickness (mean +/- standard deviation) was 99.4+/-13.2 microm, 94.5+/-15.0 microm, 79.0+/-14.5 microm, 62.7+/-10.2 microm, and 51.0+/-8.9 microm for the normal, suspect, mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. For Cirrus OCT, the corresponding measurements were 92.0+/-10.8 microm, 88.1+/-13.5 microm, 73.3+/-11.8 microm, 60.9+/-8.3 microm, and 55.3+/-6.6 microm. All Stratus-Cirrus differences were statistically significant by paired t testing (P<0.001) except for the moderate group (P = 0.11). For average RNFL, there was also a highly significant linear relationship between Stratus minus Cirrus difference and RNFL thickness (P<0.001). Bland-Altman plots showed that the systematic difference of Stratus measurements are smaller than Cirrus at thinner RNFL values but larger at thicker RNFL values.
RNFL thickness measurements between Stratus OCT and Cirrus OCT cannot be directly compared. Clinicians should be aware that measurements are generally higher with Stratus than with Cirrus except when the RNFL is very thin, as in severe glaucoma. This difference must be taken into account if comparing Stratus measurements with Cirrus measurements.
确定正常受试者和青光眼患者中,Stratus时域光学相干断层扫描(OCT)与Cirrus频域OCT(卡尔·蔡司医疗技术公司,加利福尼亚州都柏林)测量的视乳头周围视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度之间的一致性。
诊断试验或技术评估。
共分析了130名正常受试者和青光眼患者的130只眼睛。根据视野标准将受试者分为几组:正常(n = 29)、青光眼可疑(n = 12)、轻度青光眼(n = 41)、中度青光眼(n = 18)和重度青光眼(n = 30)。
在同一天,使用Stratus快速RNFL和Cirrus 200×200视盘扫描测量每位受试者一只眼睛的视乳头周围RNFL厚度,以确定一致性。两名操作人员对所有扫描均使用相同的仪器。
对RNFL厚度测量进行学生配对t检验、Pearson相关系数分析和Bland-Altman分析。
青光眼组的平均年龄显著高于正常组:分别为68.3±12.3岁和55.7±12.1岁。对于Stratus OCT,正常、可疑、轻度、中度和重度组的平均RNFL厚度(平均值±标准差)分别为99.4±13.2微米、94.5±15.0微米、79.0±14.5微米、62.7±10.2微米和51.0±8.9微米。对于Cirrus OCT,相应的测量值分别为92.0±10.8微米、88.1±13.5微米、73.3±11.8微米、60.9±8.3微米和55.3±6.6微米。除中度组外(P = 0.11),所有Stratus-Cirrus差异经配对t检验均具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。对于平均RNFL,Stratus减去Cirrus的差值与RNFL厚度之间也存在高度显著的线性关系(P<0.001)。Bland-Altman图显示,在RNFL值较薄时,Stratus测量的系统差异小于Cirrus,但在RNFL值较厚时则大于Cirrus。
Stratus OCT和Cirrus OCT测量的RNFL厚度不能直接比较。临床医生应注意,一般Stratus测量值高于Cirrus,除非RNFL非常薄,如在重度青光眼中。如果比较Stratus测量值和Cirrus测量值,必须考虑这种差异。