Suppr超能文献

神经心理学测试与访谈的秘密录音:美国国家神经心理学学会的官方立场

Secretive recording of neuropsychological testing and interviewing: official position of the National Academy of Neuropsychology.

作者信息

Bush Shane S, Pimental Patricia A, Ruff Ronald M, Iverson Grant L, Barth Jeffrey T, Broshek Donna K

机构信息

Long Island Neuropsychology, P.C., Lake Ronkonkoma, NY 11779, USA.

出版信息

Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 Feb;24(1):1-2. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acp002. Epub 2009 Mar 6.

Abstract

Neuropsychologists are occasionally asked to have neuropsychological testing observed via the presence of a third party, through one-way mirrors, or with audio or video monitoring or recording devices. The primary reasons for not allowing observation are its effect on the validity of the examination results and the security of copyrighted test materials. To overcome the problem of observer effects on the examinee's performance, some individuals have suggested that examinations be monitored or recorded without the examinee's awareness (i.e., secretly). However, secretive recording of neuropsychological interviews and testing is deceptive, which is inconsistent with ethical principles. In addition, such recording may affect the behavior of the examiner. For these reasons, neuropsychologists do not, and should not, encourage, condone, or engage in secret recording of neuropsychological interviews or testing.

摘要

神经心理学家偶尔会被要求通过第三方在场、单向镜、音频或视频监控或记录设备来观察神经心理学测试。不允许进行观察的主要原因是其对检查结果有效性的影响以及版权测试材料的安全性。为了克服观察者对受测者表现的影响问题,一些人建议在受测者不知情的情况下(即秘密地)对测试进行监控或记录。然而,对神经心理学访谈和测试进行秘密记录具有欺骗性,这与伦理原则不符。此外,这种记录可能会影响检查者的行为。出于这些原因,神经心理学家不会,也不应该鼓励、容忍或参与对神经心理学访谈或测试的秘密记录。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验