Thiboutot François, Nicole Pierre C, Trépanier Claude A, Turgeon Alexis F, Lessard Martin R
Department of Critical Care, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Can J Anaesth. 2009 Jun;56(6):412-8. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9089-7. Epub 2009 Apr 24.
Although manual in-line stabilization (MILS) is commonly used during endotracheal intubation in patients with either known or suspected cervical spine instability, the effect of MILS on orotracheal intubation is poorly documented. This study evaluated the rate of failed tracheal intubation in a fixed time interval with MILS.
Two hundred elective surgical patients were randomized into two groups. In the MILS group, the patient's head was stabilized in a neutral position by grasping the patient's mastoid processes to minimize any head movement during tracheal intubation. In the control group, the patient's head rested in an optimal position for tracheal intubation. A 30-sec period was allowed to complete tracheal intubation with a #3 Macintosh laryngoscope blade. The primary endpoint was the rate of failed tracheal intubation at 30 sec. Secondary endpoints included tracheal intubation time and the Cormack & Lehane grade of laryngoscopy.
Patient characteristics were similar with respect to demographic data and risk factors for difficult tracheal intubation. The rate of failed tracheal intubation at 30 sec was 50% (47/94) in the MILS group compared to 5.7% (6/105) in the control group (P < 0.0001). Laryngoscopic grades 3 and 4 were more frequently observed in the MILS group. Mean times for successful tracheal intubation were 15.8 +/- 8.5 sec and 8.7 +/- 4.6 sec for the MILS and control groups, respectively (mean difference 7.1, CI(95%) 5.0-9.3, P < 0.0001). All patients who failed tracheal intubation in the MILS group were successfully intubated when MILS was removed.
In patients with otherwise normal airways, MILS increases the tracheal intubation failure rate at 30 sec and worsens laryngeal visualization during direct laryngoscopy.
尽管在已知或疑似颈椎不稳患者的气管插管过程中常用手动轴向固定(MILS),但MILS对经口气管插管的影响鲜有文献记载。本研究评估了在固定时间间隔内采用MILS时气管插管失败的发生率。
200例择期手术患者随机分为两组。在MILS组,通过抓住患者乳突将患者头部固定于中立位,以在气管插管期间尽量减少头部移动。在对照组,患者头部处于气管插管的最佳位置。使用#3麦金托什喉镜叶片,允许30秒时间完成气管插管。主要终点是30秒时气管插管失败的发生率。次要终点包括气管插管时间和喉镜检查的科马克&莱汉分级。
在人口统计学数据和困难气管插管风险因素方面,两组患者特征相似。MILS组30秒时气管插管失败率为50%(47/94),而对照组为5.7%(6/105)(P<0.0001)。在MILS组,喉镜检查3级和4级更为常见。MILS组和对照组成功气管插管的平均时间分别为15.8±8.5秒和8.7±4.6秒(平均差异7.1,CI(95%)5.0 - 9.3,P<0.0001)。MILS组所有气管插管失败的患者在去除MILS后均成功插管。
在气道其他方面正常的患者中,MILS增加了30秒时气管插管失败率,并使直接喉镜检查时的喉部视野变差。