Reynolds W, Cormack D F
Highland College of Nursing and Midwifery, Inverness, Scotland.
J Adv Nurs. 1991 Sep;16(9):1122-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1991.tb03374.x.
In this paper the authors evaluate the Johnson Behavioural System Model of Nursing by applying the assessment criteria described in an earlier paper. Data for the evaluation were collected by one of the authors (W.R.) at the UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute and Hospital, and the UCLA School of Nursing, Los Angeles. The major focus of this paper relates to how nurses at the above facilities apply the Johnson Behavioural System Model of Nursing and how that relates to the questions posed in a previous paper which should be asked by clinicians when assessing the relevance of a model to clinical nursing practice: namely, (a) to what extent does the model assist with the identification of the range of human responses to actual or potential health problems? (b) How does the model enable a nursing diagnosis to be made, and what is the basis of that diagnosis? (c) Does the model explain why individuals respond to health problems in the way that they do? (d) Does the model inform clinicians of the nursing interventions required to enable the client to move towards optimum health? (e) Does the model help to provide an understanding of the desired outcome of nursing intervention?
在本文中,作者通过应用早期一篇论文中描述的评估标准,对约翰逊护理行为系统模型进行评估。评估数据由作者之一(W.R.)于洛杉矶加利福尼亚大学神经精神病学研究所及医院和洛杉矶加利福尼亚大学护理学院收集。本文的主要重点是上述机构的护士如何应用约翰逊护理行为系统模型,以及这与前一篇论文中提出的问题有何关联,临床医生在评估一个模型与临床护理实践的相关性时应提出这些问题,即:(a)该模型在多大程度上有助于识别人类对实际或潜在健康问题的反应范围?(b)该模型如何进行护理诊断,诊断的依据是什么?(c)该模型是否解释了个体为何以他们的方式对健康问题做出反应?(d)该模型是否向临床医生告知使患者朝着最佳健康状态发展所需的护理干预措施?(e)该模型是否有助于理解护理干预的预期结果?