Oprea L, Braunack-Mayer A, Gericke C A
Discipline of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
J Med Ethics. 2009 May;35(5):310-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.027078.
Neglected and tropical diseases, pervasive in developing countries, are important contributors to global health inequalities. They remain largely untreated due to lack of effective and affordable treatments. Resource-poor countries cannot afford to develop the public health interventions needed to control neglected diseases. In addition, neglected diseases do not represent an attractive market for pharmaceutical industry. Although a number of international commitments, stated in the Millennium Development Goals, have been made to avert the risk of communicable diseases, tropical diseases still remain neglected due to delays in international assistance. This delay can be explained by the form international cooperation has generally taken, which is limited to promoting countries' national interests, rather than social justice at a global level. This restricts the international responsibility for global inequalities in health to a humanitarian assistance. We propose an alternative view, arguing that expanding the scope of international cooperation by promoting shared health and economic value at a global level will create new opportunities for innovative, effective and affordable interventions worldwide. It will also promote neglected diseases as a global research priority. We build our argument on a proposal to replace the patenting system that currently regulates pharmaceutical research with a global fund to reward this research based on actual decreases in morbidity and mortality at a global level. We argue that this approach is beneficent because it will decrease global health inequalities and promote social justice worldwide.
被忽视的热带病在发展中国家普遍存在,是全球健康不平等的重要因素。由于缺乏有效且负担得起的治疗方法,这些疾病大多仍未得到治疗。资源匮乏的国家无力开展控制被忽视疾病所需的公共卫生干预措施。此外,被忽视疾病对制药行业来说并非有吸引力的市场。尽管《千年发展目标》中做出了一些国际承诺,以避免传染病风险,但由于国际援助的延迟,热带病仍然被忽视。这种延迟可以用国际合作通常采取的形式来解释,这种形式仅限于促进国家利益,而非全球层面的社会正义。这将全球健康不平等的国际责任限制为人道主义援助。我们提出另一种观点,认为通过在全球层面促进共同的健康和经济价值来扩大国际合作范围,将为全球范围内创新、有效且负担得起的干预措施创造新机会。这还将推动把被忽视疾病作为全球研究重点。我们的论点基于一项提议,即用一个全球基金取代目前监管药物研究的专利制度,该基金根据全球发病率和死亡率的实际下降情况来奖励这项研究。我们认为这种方法是有益的,因为它将减少全球健康不平等,并在全球范围内促进社会正义。