Alshami Ali M, Cairns Craig W, Wylie Bridie K, Souvlis Tina, Coppieters Michel W
School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009 Jul;35(7):1098-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.01.011. Epub 2009 May 7.
An in depth analysis of the reliability of ultrasonography to measure the cross-sectional area of the tibial nerve or any other peripheral nerve is not available in the literature. This study determined the reliability and size of the measurement error of high-resolution ultrasound to measure the size of the tibial nerve at the tarsal tunnel. The cross-sectional area of the tibial nerve was measured by two experienced sonographers at 1 cm proximal to the medial malleolus. Measurements were made in 10 healthy participants without plantar heel pain. Intra and intertester reliability were determined by calculation of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), measurement error magnitude and smallest detectable difference (SDD). A direct (tracing) and indirect (ellipsoid formula) method were evaluated. Results demonstrated that the intra and intertester reliability were excellent (ICC, all > or =0.86). The measurement error and SDD were very small, especially when measurements from three scans were averaged (measurement error: 0.4-0.9 mm2; SDD: 1.1-2.5 mm2). The findings of this study support the view that high-resolution ultrasound is reliable to measure the cross-sectional area of a peripheral nerve. As a result of the small measurement error, a side-to-side difference as small as approximately 1.8 mm2 can be interpreted meaningfully in an individual patient. This difference is much smaller than the swelling reported in the literature for patients with tibial neuropathy.
文献中尚无对超声测量胫神经或任何其他周围神经横截面积可靠性的深入分析。本研究确定了高分辨率超声测量跗管处胫神经大小的可靠性及测量误差大小。由两名经验丰富的超声检查人员在内踝近端1 cm处测量胫神经的横截面积。对10名无足跟足底疼痛的健康参与者进行测量。通过计算组内相关系数(ICC)、测量误差大小和最小可检测差异(SDD)来确定检查者内和检查者间的可靠性。评估了直接(追踪)和间接(椭圆公式)方法。结果表明,检查者内和检查者间的可靠性极佳(ICC均≥0.86)。测量误差和SDD非常小,尤其是对三次扫描的测量结果进行平均时(测量误差:0.4 - 0.9 mm²;SDD:1.1 - 2.5 mm²)。本研究结果支持高分辨率超声测量周围神经横截面积可靠这一观点。由于测量误差小,个体患者两侧相差约1.8 mm² 即可进行有意义的解读。这一差异远小于文献报道的胫神经病变患者的肿胀程度。