Blair Aaron, Freeman Laura Beane
Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
J Agromedicine. 2009;14(2):125-31. doi: 10.1080/10599240902779436.
This paper reviews epidemiologic studies of cancer among agricultural populations to identify possible associations and to provide a focus for future investigations. Meta-analyses of mortality surveys of farmers find excesses of several cancers, including connective tissue, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, multiple myeloma and cancers of the skin, stomach, and brain, and deficits for total mortality, heart disease, total cancer, and cancers of the esophagus, colon, lung, and bladder. Meta-analyses of studies of individual cancers also support these findings, indicating a need to identify exposures and lifestyle factors that might account for this mortality pattern. Although cancer studies of other occupations that might have pesticide exposures in common with farmers show some similarities with observations among farmers, the overall patterns are quite different. This suggests that pesticides are not likely to fully explain the cancer and other disease patterns observed among farmers. Because exposures vary by type of farm operation, exposures for individual farmers can differ considerably. Studies in the future need to focus on the full range of exposures to fully understand the cancer pattern in farmers.
本文回顾了农业人口癌症的流行病学研究,以确定可能的关联,并为未来的调查提供重点。对农民死亡率调查的荟萃分析发现,几种癌症的死亡率过高,包括结缔组织癌、非霍奇金淋巴瘤、霍奇金病、多发性骨髓瘤以及皮肤癌、胃癌和脑癌,而总死亡率、心脏病、总癌症以及食管癌、结肠癌、肺癌和膀胱癌的死亡率则有所下降。对个别癌症研究的荟萃分析也支持了这些发现,表明需要确定可能导致这种死亡率模式的暴露因素和生活方式因素。尽管对其他可能与农民有共同农药暴露的职业的癌症研究与农民中的观察结果有一些相似之处,但总体模式却大不相同。这表明,农药不太可能完全解释在农民中观察到的癌症和其他疾病模式。由于暴露因农场经营类型而异,个体农民的暴露情况可能有很大差异。未来的研究需要关注全面的暴露情况,以充分了解农民中的癌症模式。