Ozcan Mehmet S, Thompson David M, Cure Jorge, Hine J Randal, Roberts Pamela R
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
Anesth Analg. 2009 Jun;108(6):1830-5. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31819dc668.
State Entropy (SE) is an index of anesthetic depth similar to Bispectral Index (BIS). Both indices use a single-channel electroencephalogram, recorded from a unilaterally applied electrode on the forehead, as their input. Intrapatient reproducibility of BIS was questioned in a recent study in which simultaneous measurements from two electrodes applied to the same patient showed conflicting anesthetic depths. Our purpose was to determine whether SE results are similarly reproducible, even though their computation uses a different algorithm than BIS. In this study, we investigated the reproducibility of SE measurements simultaneously obtained from bilaterally applied electrodes in the same patient.
Entropy electrodes were applied bilaterally on 21 patients under general inhaled anesthesia. Simultaneous SE measurements from both electrodes were recorded every 10 s from each patient. Data were analyzed with Bland-Altman statistics.
We obtained 14,379 pairs of SE measurements. Four percent of the individual measurements suggested conflicting anesthetic depth along with a numeric difference more than 10 points. Bias was not clinically significant (-0.3). Ninety-five percent limits of agreement were -11.7 and +11.6.
SE showed a clinically significant degree of disagreement when probes were applied on both sides of the forehead in the same patient. Bland-Altman statistics showed better same-patient reproducibility in SE than did a similar study on BIS. Nevertheless, 4% of the simultaneously measured pairs of SE suggested different anesthetic depths and differed by more than 10 points. Caution is advised when using SE as a clinical index of anesthetic depth.
状态熵(SE)是一种类似于脑电双频指数(BIS)的麻醉深度指标。这两种指标都使用从额头单侧放置的电极记录的单通道脑电图作为输入。在最近一项研究中,对BIS在患者体内的可重复性提出了质疑,该研究中对同一患者同时使用两个电极进行测量时,显示出麻醉深度相互矛盾。我们的目的是确定SE结果是否同样具有可重复性,尽管其计算使用的算法与BIS不同。在本研究中,我们调查了在同一患者双侧放置电极同时获得的SE测量值的可重复性。
在21例全身吸入麻醉患者双侧放置熵电极。每隔10秒记录每位患者两个电极同时测得的SE值。采用Bland-Altman统计方法分析数据。
我们获得了14379对SE测量值。4%的个体测量值表明麻醉深度相互矛盾,数值差异超过10分。偏差在临床上无显著意义(-0.3)。一致性界限的95%为-11.7和+11.6。
当在同一患者额头两侧应用探头时,SE显示出临床上显著程度的不一致。Bland-Altman统计显示,与一项关于BIS的类似研究相比,SE在同一患者中的可重复性更好。然而,4%同时测量的SE对表明麻醉深度不同,且差异超过10分。使用SE作为麻醉深度的临床指标时建议谨慎。