Suppr超能文献

儿童乘客的前排与后排座位受伤风险:新型车辆评估

Front versus rear seat injury risk for child passengers: evaluation of newer model year vehicles.

作者信息

Arbogast Kristy B, Kallan Michael J, Durbin Dennis R

机构信息

The Center for Injury Research and Prevention, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th and Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2009 Jun;10(3):297-301. doi: 10.1080/15389580802677799.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Design improvements to frontal air bags for vehicles of model year 1998 and newer have reduced the risk of injury to child occupants exposed to their deployment. These changes in conjunction with other improvements in the protection of front seat occupants give impetus for the reconsideration of rear seating recommendations for child occupants. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the association between seating row (front vs. rear) and risk of injury to children in newer model year vehicles.

METHODS

Data was collected on child occupants from December 1, 1998, to November 30, 2007, via insurance claim records and a validated telephone survey. The study sample included child occupants aged 0 to 15 years seated in the front and rear rows of vehicles model year 1998 or newer, involved in a crash in sixteen states. Children were classified as injured if a parent or driver reported an injury corresponding with Abbreviated Injury Scale scores of > or =2. The age-specific relative risk of injury by seat row was calculated for the whole data set and then further stratified by model year.

RESULTS

Complete interview data were obtained on 10,670 crashes involving 16,920 children, representing an estimated 205,408 crashes with 314,968 child passengers in the study population. The adjusted relative risk of injury to children in the rear seat compared to those in the front was 0.36 (0.23-0.57) and 0.69 (0.49-0.98) for 0- to 8-year-olds and 9- to 12-year-olds, respectively. For 13- to 15-year-olds, the reduced injury risk associated with rear row seating narrowly missed statistical significance. When stratified by model year (1998 to 2002 and 2003+), all age group/model year combinations demonstrated a crude rear row injury risk that was lower than that of the front row.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis, conducted on a set of vehicles with advanced front seat safety systems including second-generation and newer air bags, strongly confirmed the recommendation that all children 0-12 years should be seated in the rear row(s) of their vehicles. Children in the rear row(s) were one half to two thirds as likely to sustain injury than those in the front after adjusting for potentially confounding crash, vehicle, and child factors.

摘要

目的

1998年及更新车型车辆的正面安全气囊设计改进降低了儿童乘员在安全气囊展开时受到伤害的风险。这些改变以及前排乘客保护方面的其他改进促使人们重新考虑儿童乘员的后排座位建议。因此,本研究的目的是评估座位排(前排与后排)与新型号车辆中儿童受伤风险之间的关联。

方法

通过保险理赔记录和经过验证的电话调查收集了1998年12月1日至2007年11月30日期间儿童乘员的数据。研究样本包括年龄在0至15岁、坐在1998年或更新车型车辆前排和后排的儿童乘员,这些车辆在16个州发生了碰撞事故。如果父母或司机报告有与简略损伤量表评分≥2相对应的损伤,则将儿童归类为受伤。计算整个数据集按座位排划分的特定年龄受伤相对风险,然后按车型年份进一步分层。

结果

获得了涉及16920名儿童的10670起碰撞事故的完整访谈数据,在研究人群中估计代表205408起碰撞事故和314968名儿童乘客。0至8岁和9至12岁儿童中,后排儿童受伤的调整后相对风险分别为0.36(0.23 - 0.57)和0.69(0.49 - 0.98)。对于13至15岁儿童,后排座位相关的受伤风险降低在统计学意义上勉强未达到显著水平。按车型年份分层(1998年至2002年和2003年及以后)时,所有年龄组/车型年份组合显示出后排的粗略受伤风险低于前排。

结论

对一组配备包括第二代及更新安全气囊在内的先进前排安全系统的车辆进行的这项分析,有力地证实了所有0至12岁儿童都应坐在车辆后排的建议。在调整了潜在的混杂碰撞、车辆和儿童因素后,后排儿童受伤的可能性是前排儿童的二分之一至三分之二。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验