Suppr超能文献

加拿大老年人及其主要非正规照护者在行为方面是否存在关于机构化的共识?

Is there agreement between Canadian older adults and their primary informal caregivers on behaviour towards institutionalisation?

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Community. 2009 Nov;17(6):610-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2009.00862.x. Epub 2009 May 13.

Abstract

We aimed to compare behaviour towards institutionalisation between frail older adults and their informal caregivers, and identify correlates of differential behaviour. In 2004, during the fourth wave of the longitudinal Program of Research to Integrate Services for the Maintenance of Autonomy (PRISMA) study (province of Québec, Canada), 86.7% of eligible dyads, that is 593 participants and their primary informal caregivers, were asked separately if they thought about placement, discussed it with someone or visited an institution during the previous year. An ordinal measure of behaviour towards institutional placement was derived and agreement between dyad members was assessed with the weighted kappa. Although identical behaviour was relatively high (65.4%), it represented almost exclusively no thoughts by either member and the weighted kappa was low (0.16). Differential behaviour was then analysed as a three-level dependent variable (thoughts only by the care-receiver, thoughts only by the caregiver, no thoughts by either dyad member) in a multiple multinomial logistic regression analysis. Compared with neither person thinking about it, the care-receiver alone thinking about placement was associated with using voluntary services, receiving help for home maintenance and visits to the emergency room during the previous year, along with the caregiver being aged 70 years or over. Compared with neither person thinking about it, the caregiver alone thinking about placement was associated with being male, not residing with the care-receiver, sensing a higher subjective burden, along with the care-receiver being 85 years or older, not being able to feed him/herself independently and visits to the emergency room during the previous year. Identified correlates can be useful in targeting dyads likely to behave differently. Communication within these dyads needs to be enhanced, as it is crucial to ensure that both parties are comfortable with possible future institutionalisation. In this regard, health professionals could play a role in bringing the issue to discussion.

摘要

我们旨在比较体弱老年人及其非正规照护者对机构化的态度,并确定导致态度差异的相关因素。2004 年,在纵向计划研究以整合维持自主服务(PRISMA)的第四次浪潮(魁北克省,加拿大)中,对符合条件的 86.7%的配对者,即 593 名参与者及其主要非正规照护者,分别询问他们在过去一年中是否考虑过安置、与他人讨论过或参观过机构。得出了对机构安置行为的有序衡量标准,并通过加权 Kappa 评估了对成员之间的一致性。尽管相同的行为相对较高(65.4%),但它几乎只代表了双方都没有任何想法,加权 Kappa 较低(0.16)。然后,在多分类多项逻辑回归分析中,将差异行为作为一个三水平的因变量(仅照护接受者有想法、仅照护者有想法、双方均无想法)进行分析。与双方均无想法相比,仅照护接受者考虑安置与过去一年中使用自愿服务、接受家庭维护帮助和急诊室就诊有关,同时照护者年龄在 70 岁或以上。与双方均无想法相比,仅照护者考虑安置与男性、不与照护接受者居住、感知更高的主观负担有关,同时照护接受者 85 岁或以上、不能独立进食和过去一年中急诊室就诊有关。确定的相关因素可用于针对可能表现出不同行为的对。需要加强这些对之间的沟通,因为确保双方对可能的未来机构化感到舒适至关重要。在这方面,卫生专业人员可以在将问题纳入讨论方面发挥作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验