Iguchi Martin Y, Ober Allison J, Berry Sandra H, Fain Terry, Heckathorn Douglas D, Gorbach Pamina M, Heimer Robert, Kozlov Andrei, Ouellet Lawrence J, Shoptaw Steven, Zule William A
RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90407, USA.
J Urban Health. 2009 Jul;86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):5-31. doi: 10.1007/s11524-009-9365-4. Epub 2009 May 27.
The Sexual Acquisition and Transmission of HIV Cooperative Agreement Program (SATHCAP) examined the role of drug use in the sexual transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) from traditional high-risk groups, such as men who have sex with men (MSM) and drug users (DU), to lower risk groups in three US cities and in St. Petersburg, Russia. SATHCAP employed respondent-driven sampling (RDS) and a dual high-risk group sampling approach that relied on peer recruitment for a combined, overlapping sample of MSM and DU. The goal of the sampling approach was to recruit an RDS sample of MSM, DU, and individuals who were both MSM and DU (MSM/DU), as well as a sample of sex partners of MSM, DU, and MSM/DU and sex partners of sex partners. The approach efficiently yielded a sample of 8,355 participants, including sex partners, across all four sites. At the US sites-Los Angeles, Chicago, and Raleigh-Durham-the sample consisted of older (mean age = 41 years), primarily black MSM and DU (both injecting and non-injecting); in St. Petersburg, the sample consisted of primarily younger (mean age = 28 years) MSM and DU (injecting). The US sites recruited a large proportion of men who have sex with men and with women, an important group with high potential for establishing a generalized HIV epidemic involving women. The advantage of using the dual high-risk group approach and RDS was, for the most part, the large, efficiently recruited samples of MSM, DU, and MSM/DU. The disadvantages were a recruitment bias by race/ethnicity and income status (at the US sites) and under-enrollment of MSM samples because of short recruitment chains (at the Russian site).
艾滋病病毒性传播与感染合作协议项目(SATHCAP)研究了吸毒在人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)从传统高危群体,如同性恋男性(MSM)和吸毒者(DU),向美国三个城市以及俄罗斯圣彼得堡的低风险群体性传播过程中所起的作用。SATHCAP采用了应答驱动抽样(RDS)和双重高危群体抽样方法,该方法依靠同伴招募,以获取MSM和DU的合并重叠样本。抽样方法的目标是招募MSM、DU以及既是MSM又是DU(MSM/DU)的个体的RDS样本,以及MSM、DU和MSM/DU的性伴侣和性伴侣的性伴侣的样本。该方法有效地在所有四个地点获得了包括性伴侣在内共8355名参与者的样本。在美国的洛杉矶、芝加哥和罗利-达勒姆地点,样本由年龄较大(平均年龄 = 41岁)、主要为黑人的MSM和DU(包括注射吸毒者和非注射吸毒者)组成;在圣彼得堡,样本主要由年龄较小(平均年龄 = 28岁)的MSM和DU(注射吸毒者)组成。美国的地点招募了很大比例的双性恋男性,这是一个在引发涉及女性的广泛HIV流行方面具有很高潜力的重要群体。使用双重高危群体方法和RDS的优势在很大程度上在于高效招募到了大量的MSM、DU和MSM/DU样本。缺点是存在种族/族裔和收入状况方面的招募偏差(在美国地点),以及由于招募链较短导致MSM样本入组不足(在俄罗斯地点)。