Institut Charles Gerhardt Montpellier, UMR 5253-UM2-CNRS-ENSCM-UM1, CTMM, Bâtiment 15, CC 1501, Université Montpellier 2, 34095 Montpellier, Cedex 05, France.
J Phys Chem A. 2009 Nov 5;113(44):12285-94. doi: 10.1021/jp9020257.
The 12-dimensional ab initio potential for the water dimer with flexible monomers from Huang et al. (J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128, 034312) was used in accurate calculations of the vibration-rotation-tunneling (VRT) levels of (H2O)2 and (D2O)2 involving the intermolecular rovibrational and tunneling states as well as the intramolecular vibrations. For the intermolecular VRT levels we used a 6 + 6d model in which the fast intramolecular vibrations are adiabatically separated from the much slower intermolecular vibrations, tunneling motions, and overall rotations. We also tested two six-dimensional (6d) rigid monomer models in which the monomers were frozen either at their equilibrium geometry or at their ground state vibrationally averaged geometry. All the results from the 6 + 6d model agree well with the large amount of detailed experimental data available from high-resolution spectroscopy. For most of the parameters characterizing the spectra the results of the two 6d rigid monomer models do not significantly differ from the 6 + 6d results. An exception is the relatively large acceptor tunneling splitting, which was the only quantity for which the 6d model with the monomers frozen at their equilibrium geometry was not in good agreement with the experimental data. The 6d model with monomers at their vibrationally averaged geometry performs considerably better, and the full 6 + 6d results agree with the measurements also for this quantity. For the excited intramolecular vibrations we tested two 6 + 6d models. In the first model the excitation was assumed to be either on the donor in the hydrogen bond or on the acceptor, and to hop from one monomer to the other upon donor-acceptor interchange. In the second model the monomer excitation remains localized on a given monomer for all dimer geometries. Almost the same frequencies of the intramolecular vibrations were found for the two models. The calculations show considerable variations in the frequencies of the intramolecular modes for transitions involving different tunneling levels and different values of the rotational quantum number K. For K = 0 --> 0 transitions these variations largely cancel, however. A comparison with experimental data is difficult, except for the acceptor asymmetric stretch mode observed in high-resolution spectra, because it is not clear how much the different transitions contribute to the (unresolved) peaks in most of the experimental spectra. The large red shift of the donor bound OH stretch mode is correctly predicted, but the value calculated for this red shift is too small by more than 20%. Also in the smaller shifts of the other modes we find relatively large errors. It is useful, however, that our detailed calculations including all ground and excited state tunneling levels provide an explanation for the splitting of the acceptor asymmetric stretch band observed in He nanodroplet spectra, as well as for the fact that the other bands in these spectra show much smaller or no splittings.
Huang 等人的《J. Chem. Phys.》(2008,128,034312)中使用了 12 维从头算水二聚体势来精确计算(H2O)2 和(D2O)2 的振动-转动-隧穿(VRT)能级,包括分子间的振转和隧穿态以及分子内振动。对于分子间的 VRT 能级,我们使用了 6+6d 模型,其中快速的分子内振动与慢得多的分子间振动、隧穿运动和整体旋转绝热分离。我们还测试了两个六维(6d)刚性单体模型,其中单体要么冻结在其平衡几何形状,要么冻结在其基态振动平均几何形状。6+6d 模型的所有结果都与高分辨率光谱提供的大量详细实验数据吻合良好。对于表征光谱的大多数参数,两个 6d 刚性单体模型的结果与 6+6d 结果没有显著差异。一个例外是较大的受体隧穿分裂,这是唯一一个 6d 模型中单体冻结在其平衡几何形状时与实验数据不一致的量。单体在其振动平均几何形状上的 6d 模型表现要好得多,而对于这个量,完整的 6+6d 结果也与测量结果一致。对于激发的分子内振动,我们测试了两个 6+6d 模型。在第一个模型中,激发假设要么在氢键的供体上,要么在受体上,并且在供体-受体交换时从一个单体跳跃到另一个单体。在第二个模型中,单体激发在所有二聚体几何形状上仍然局限于给定的单体。对于这两个模型,我们发现分子内振动的频率几乎相同。计算表明,对于涉及不同隧穿能级和不同转动量子数 K 的跃迁,分子内模式的频率会有很大的变化。然而,对于 K=0->0 跃迁,这些变化在很大程度上相互抵消。与实验数据的比较很困难,除了在高分辨率光谱中观察到的受体不对称拉伸模式,因为不清楚不同的跃迁对大多数实验光谱中的(未分辨)峰有多大贡献。供体束缚 OH 拉伸模式的大红移被正确预测,但计算出的红移值小了 20%以上。我们还发现其他模式的较小位移也存在较大误差。然而,我们详细的计算包括所有基态和激发态隧穿能级,为氦纳米液滴光谱中观察到的受体不对称拉伸带的分裂以及这些光谱中其他带的分裂较小或没有分裂提供了解释,这是非常有用的。