Shah Sejal S, Faquin William C, Izquierdo Roberto, Khurana Kamal K
Department of Pathology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Cytojournal. 2009 Jan 19;6:1. doi: 10.4103/1742-6413.45191.
Fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is a popular, reliable and cost effective technique for the diagnosis of thyroid lesions. The aim of our study was to review cases of misclassified primary malignant neoplasms of the thyroid by FNA, and assess the causes of cytologic misdiagnosis and their impact on clinical management.
Clinical data, FNA smears and follow-up surgical specimens of cases diagnosed with primary thyroid carcinoma were reviewed.
Of the 365 cases with a malignant diagnosis by FNA over a period of 11 years, nine (2.4 %) were identified with discrepant histologic diagnosis with regard to the type of primary thyroid malignancy. In addition, four cases were added from the consultation files of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Areas of difficulty contributing to misclassification included overlapping cytologic features (n = 6), rarity of tumors (n = 3), and sampling limitations (n = 4). Of the 13 cases, 12 underwent total or near total thyroidectomy and one patient had concurrent surgical biopsy. Measurement of serum calcitonin levels in one case, with an initial cytologic diagnosis of medullary carcinoma, prevented unnecessary lymph node dissection. Misclassification of medullary carcinoma as papillary carcinoma precluded lymph node dissection in one case. Further management decisions were based on the final histologic diagnosis and did not require additional surgery. Two cases of undifferentiated (anaplastic) thyroid carcinoma were misdiagnosed as papillary thyroid carcinoma. Both patients received total thyroidectomies, which may not otherwise have been performed.
A small subset of primary malignant neoplasms of the thyroid may be misclassified with regard to the type of malignancy on FNA. The majority of primary malignant neoplasms diagnosed on FNA require thyroidectomy. However, initial cytologic misclassification of medullary carcinoma or undifferentiated carcinoma as other malignant neoplasms or vice versa may have an impact on clinical management.
细针穿刺(FNA)细胞学检查是诊断甲状腺病变的一种常用、可靠且经济有效的技术。我们研究的目的是回顾经FNA误诊的原发性甲状腺恶性肿瘤病例,评估细胞学误诊的原因及其对临床管理的影响。
回顾原发性甲状腺癌诊断病例的临床资料、FNA涂片及后续手术标本。
在11年期间经FNA诊断为恶性的365例病例中,9例(2.4%)原发性甲状腺恶性肿瘤的组织学诊断存在差异。此外,从麻省总医院的会诊档案中补充了4例。导致误诊的难点包括细胞学特征重叠(n = 6)、肿瘤罕见(n = 3)和取材限制(n = 4)。13例病例中,12例行甲状腺全切或近全切术,1例患者同时进行了手术活检。1例最初细胞学诊断为髓样癌的病例,检测血清降钙素水平避免了不必要的淋巴结清扫。1例髓样癌误诊为乳头状癌的病例未进行淋巴结清扫。进一步的治疗决策基于最终的组织学诊断,无需额外手术。2例未分化(间变性)甲状腺癌误诊为乳头状甲状腺癌。两名患者均接受了甲状腺全切术,否则可能不会进行该手术。
一小部分原发性甲状腺恶性肿瘤在FNA时可能出现恶性类型的误诊。大多数经FNA诊断的原发性恶性肿瘤需要进行甲状腺切除术。然而,髓样癌或未分化癌最初细胞学误诊为其他恶性肿瘤,反之亦然,可能会对临床管理产生影响。