The Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Monroe Carell, Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Nov 1;74(5):747-52. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22084.
To compare two methods of pulmonary arterial pressure measurement in children with shunt-dependent pulmonary blood flow.
In children with shunt-dependent pulmonary blood flow, direct assessment of pulmonary arterial pressure requires passage of a catheter across the shunt. This can be technically difficult and dangerous. Use of the pulmonary venous wedge pressure offers an alternative but has not been validated in this patient population.
We prospectively studied 18 children with shunt-dependent pulmonary blood flow. Pulmonary venous wedge pressure and directly measured pulmonary arterial pressures were independently assessed by two blinded cardiologists.
Directly measured mean pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary venous wedge pressure are closely correlated (R2 = 0.80, P < 0.01). Agreement between the two measures is improved at lower mean pressures with greater differences at higher pressures. For 20 of 24 ipsilateral measurements, pulmonary venous wedge pressure was > or = directly measured pulmonary arterial pressure. Pulmonary venous wedge pressure never underestimated pulmonary arterial pressure by more than 3 mm Hg.
Pulmonary venous wedge pressure provides a safe and accurate means of estimating pulmonary arterial pressure in children with shunt-dependent pulmonary blood flow. The slightly lower pressures seen on direct measurement compared with the reverse pulmonary vein may reflect impairment of flow across the shunt by the catheter.
比较两种测量分流依赖型肺血流患儿肺动脉压的方法。
在分流依赖型肺血流患儿中,直接评估肺动脉压需要导管穿过分流。这在技术上可能很困难,并且有危险。使用肺静脉楔压提供了一种替代方法,但尚未在该患者人群中得到验证。
我们前瞻性研究了 18 例分流依赖型肺血流患儿。两位盲法心脏病专家分别独立评估肺静脉楔压和直接测量的肺动脉压。
直接测量的平均肺动脉压与肺静脉楔压密切相关(R2=0.80,P<0.01)。两种测量方法的一致性在平均压力较低时有所提高,而在压力较高时差异较大。24 次同侧测量中,20 次肺静脉楔压>或=直接测量的肺动脉压。肺静脉楔压从未低估肺动脉压超过 3 毫米汞柱。
肺静脉楔压为测量分流依赖型肺血流患儿的肺动脉压提供了一种安全、准确的方法。与反向肺静脉相比,直接测量的压力略低,可能反映导管通过分流的血流受损。