Department of Primary Industries & Fisheries, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Zoonoses Public Health. 2009 Aug;56(6-7):278-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01218.x.
Nearly 75% of all emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) that impact or threaten human health are zoonotic. The majority have spilled from wildlife reservoirs, either directly to humans or via domestic animals. The emergence of many can be attributed to predisposing factors such as global travel, trade, agricultural expansion, deforestation/habitat fragmentation, and urbanization; such factors increase the interface and/or the rate of contact between human, domestic animal, and wildlife populations, thereby creating increased opportunities for spillover events to occur. Infectious disease emergence can be regarded as primarily an ecological process. The epidemiological investigation of EIDs associated with wildlife requires a trans-disciplinary approach that includes an understanding of the ecology of the wildlife species, and an understanding of human behaviours that increase risk of exposure. Investigations of the emergence of Nipah virus in Malaysia in 1999 and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in China in 2003 provide useful case studies. The emergence of Nipah virus was associated with the increased size and density of commercial pig farms and their encroachment into forested areas. The movement of pigs for sale and slaughter in turn led to the rapid spread of infection to southern peninsular Malaysia, where the high-density, largely urban pig populations facilitated transmission to humans. Identifying the factors associated with the emergence of SARS in southern China requires an understanding of the ecology of infection both in the natural reservoir and in secondary market reservoir species. A necessary extension of understanding the ecology of the reservoir is an understanding of the trade, and of the social and cultural context of wildlife consumption. Emerging infectious diseases originating from wildlife populations will continue to threaten public health. Mitigating and managing the risk requires an appreciation of the connectedness between human, livestock and wildlife health, and of the factors and processes that disrupt the balance.
近 75%对人类健康造成或威胁的新发传染病(EIDs)是动物源性传染病。大多数疾病都从野生动物宿主直接传播给人类,或者通过家畜传播。许多疾病的出现可归因于一些诱发因素,如全球旅行、贸易、农业扩张、森林砍伐/栖息地破碎化和城市化;这些因素增加了人类、家畜和野生动物之间的接触界面和/或接触频率,从而增加了溢出事件发生的机会。传染病的出现可以被视为主要是一个生态过程。与野生动物相关的 EIDs 的流行病学调查需要采用跨学科方法,包括了解野生动物物种的生态学,以及了解增加暴露风险的人类行为。对 1999 年马来西亚尼帕病毒和 2003 年中国严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)的暴发进行的调查提供了有用的案例研究。尼帕病毒的暴发与商业养猪场的规模和密度增加以及它们侵入森林地区有关。为了销售和屠宰而转移的猪反过来又导致感染迅速传播到马来西亚半岛南部,那里高密度的、主要是城市的猪群促进了向人类的传播。要确定与中国南方 SARS 暴发相关的因素,需要了解感染在自然宿主和二级市场宿主物种中的生态学。理解宿主生态学的一个必要延伸是理解贸易以及野生动物消费的社会和文化背景。起源于野生动物种群的新发传染病将继续威胁公共卫生。减轻和管理风险需要认识到人类、牲畜和野生动物健康之间的联系,以及破坏平衡的因素和过程。