Khan Mohammad Usman Nasir, Lall Purandath, Harris Linda M, Dryjski Maciej L, Dosluoglu Hasan H
Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Jun;49(6):1440-5; discussion 1445-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.02.226.
The goal of this study was to assess the frequency and predictors of major amputation with patent endovascular-treated arterial segments (PETAS) in patients with critical limb ischemia.
The study included 358 consecutive patients (412 limbs) who underwent endovascular (236 limbs) or open (176 limbs) revascularizations for critical limb ischemia from June 2001 through May 2007. Patients with limb loss despite PETAS were compared with the rest of the endovascular-treated group (EV-other, n = 212) and with those who underwent amputations with patent bypasses (APB).
The EV group underwent 30 amputations (24 in PETAS, 6 in EV-other), and 37 occurred in the open group (14 in APB, 23 in open-other). Amputations occurring despite a patent revascularized segment constituted 38% of limb loss in open and 80% in EV-treated patients (P = .001). Limb loss occurred earlier in the PETAS group (58% vs 30% <or=3 months). Primary indications for limb loss in the PETAS group were extensive tissue loss or limb dysfunction after radical debridement of infection or gangrene (37%), recurrent infection (42%), and failure to reverse ischemia (21%). There were more patients with diabetes in PETAS group (96%) than in the APB group (64%, P = .018). Diabetes, dialysis-dependence, lower albumin level, gangrene, and infrapopliteal interventions were more likely in the PETAS group than in the EV-other group. Multivariate analysis showed diabetes (odds ratio [OR], 3.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-8.13, P = .018), gangrene (OR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.43-7.75; P = .005), and infrapopliteal interventions (OR, 3.09; 95% CI, 1.38-6.94; P = .006), predicted limb loss with patent open or EV-treated segments, whereas dialysis-dependence, peroneal artery-only runoff, albumin level <3 g/dL, location at the heel, and treatment type did not.
Amputation despite PETAS is the most common means of limb loss in patients undergoing endovascular revascularization for limb salvage. It is likely the result of aggressive attempts at limb salvage and usually occurs <or=3 months after the intervention. Patients with diabetes and gangrene undergoing infrapopliteal interventions are at a significantly high risk. Adjuncts to reduce tissue loss, preserve limb function, and prevent recurrent infection are needed to prevent limb loss despite PETAS, especially in diabetic patients.
本研究的目的是评估接受血管腔内治疗的动脉节段通畅(PETAS)的严重肢体缺血患者大截肢的频率及预测因素。
本研究纳入了2001年6月至2007年5月期间因严重肢体缺血接受血管腔内(236条肢体)或开放(176条肢体)血运重建的358例连续患者(412条肢体)。将尽管有PETAS但仍发生肢体缺失的患者与血管腔内治疗组的其余患者(EV-其他,n = 212)以及接受旁路移植通畅时截肢的患者(APB)进行比较。
血管腔内治疗组进行了30例截肢(PETAS组24例,EV-其他组6例),开放手术组进行了37例截肢(APB组14例,开放-其他组23例)。尽管血运重建节段通畅仍发生截肢的情况在开放手术组的肢体缺失中占38%,在血管腔内治疗组患者中占80%(P = 0.001)。PETAS组肢体缺失出现得更早(≤3个月时为58%对30%)。PETAS组肢体缺失的主要原因是感染或坏疽彻底清创后广泛的组织丢失或肢体功能障碍(37%)、反复感染(42%)以及缺血未能逆转(21%)。PETAS组糖尿病患者(96%)多于APB组(64%,P = 0.018)。与EV-其他组相比,PETAS组糖尿病、依赖透析、白蛋白水平较低、坏疽以及腘以下干预更为常见。多因素分析显示糖尿病(比值比[OR],3.15;95%置信区间[CI],1.22 - 8.13,P = 0.018)、坏疽(OR,3.33;95% CI,1.43 - 7.75;P = 0.005)以及腘以下干预(OR,3.09;95% CI,1.38 - 6.94;P = 0.006)可预测开放或血管腔内治疗节段通畅时的肢体缺失,而依赖透析、仅腓动脉供血、白蛋白水平<3 g/dL足跟部位以及治疗类型则不能。
对于接受血管腔内血运重建以挽救肢体的患者,尽管有PETAS仍进行截肢是肢体缺失最常见的方式。这可能是积极挽救肢体尝试的结果,通常发生在干预后≤3个月。接受腘以下干预的糖尿病和坏疽患者风险显著增高。需要采取辅助措施减少组织丢失、保留肢体功能并预防反复感染,以防止尽管有PETAS仍发生肢体缺失,尤其是在糖尿病患者中。