Schmoelz Werner, Onder U, Martin A, von Strempel A
Department of Trauma Surgery, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Eur Spine J. 2009 Oct;18(10):1478-85. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1052-3. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
In advanced stages of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine instrumented spondylodesis is still the golden standard treatment. However, in recent years dynamic stabilisation devices are being implanted to treat the segmental instability due to iatrogenic decompression or segmental degeneration. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the stabilising effect of a classical pedicle screw/rod combination, with a moveable hinge joint connection between the screw and rod allowing one degree of freedom (cosmicMIA). Six human lumbar spines (L2-5) were loaded in a spine tester with pure moments of +/-7.5 Nm in lateral bending, flexion/extension and axial rotation. The range of motion (ROM) and the neutral zone were determined for the following states: (1) intact, (2) monosegmental dynamic instrumentation (L4-5), (3) bisegmental dynamic instrumentation (L3-5), (4) bisegmental decompression (L3-5), (5) bisegmental dynamic instrumentation (L3-5) and (6) bisegmental rigid instrumentation (L3-5). Compared to the intact, with monosegmental instrumentation (2) the ROM of the treated segment was reduced to 47, 40 and 77% in lateral bending, flexion/extension and axial rotation, respectively. Bisegmental dynamic instrumentation (3) further reduced the ROM in L4-5 compared to monosegmental instrumentation to 25% (lateral bending), 28% (flexion/extension) and 57% (axial rotation). Bisegmental surgical decompression (4) caused an increase in ROM in both segments (L3-4 and L4-5) to approximately 125% and approximately 135% and 187-234% in lateral bending, flexion/extension and axial rotation, respectively. Compared to the intact state, bisegmental dynamic instrumentation after surgical decompression reduced the ROM of the two-bridged segments to 29-35% in lateral bending and 33-38% in flexion/extension. In axial rotation, the ROM was in the range of the intact specimen (87-117%). A rigid instrumentation (6) further reduced the ROM of the two-bridged segments to 20-30, 23-27 and 50-68% in lateral bending, flexion/extension and axial rotation, respectively. The results of the present study showed that compared to the intact specimen the investigated hinged dynamic stabilisation device reduced the ROM after bisegmental decompression in lateral bending and flexion/extension. Following bisegmental decompression and the thereby caused large rotational instability the device is capable of restoring the motion in axial rotation back to values in the range of the intact motion segments.
在腰椎退行性疾病的晚期,器械辅助脊柱融合术仍是金标准治疗方法。然而,近年来,动态稳定装置被用于治疗因医源性减压或节段性退变导致的节段性不稳定。本研究的目的是研究一种经典的椎弓根螺钉/棒组合的稳定效果,该组合在螺钉和棒之间有一个可移动的铰链接头,允许一个自由度(cosmicMIA)。六具人类腰椎(L2 - 5)在脊柱测试仪中承受±7.5 Nm的纯力矩,分别进行侧弯、屈伸和轴向旋转测试。测定以下状态下的活动范围(ROM)和中性区:(1)完整状态,(2)单节段动态内固定(L4 - 5),(3)双节段动态内固定(L3 - 5),(4)双节段减压(L3 - 5),(5)双节段动态内固定(L3 - 5),以及(6)双节段刚性内固定(L3 - 5)。与完整状态相比,单节段内固定(2)时,治疗节段在侧弯、屈伸和轴向旋转时的ROM分别降至47%、40%和77%。与单节段内固定相比,双节段动态内固定(3)使L4 - 5节段的ROM在侧弯时进一步降至25%,屈伸时降至28%,轴向旋转时降至57%。双节段手术减压(4)使两个节段(L3 - 4和L4 - 5)在侧弯、屈伸和轴向旋转时的ROM分别增加至约125%、约135%和187 - 234%。与完整状态相比,手术减压后的双节段动态内固定使两个桥接节段在侧弯时的ROM降至29 - 35%,屈伸时降至33 - 38%。在轴向旋转时,ROM处于完整标本的范围内(87 - 117%)。刚性内固定(6)使两个桥接节段在侧弯、屈伸和轴向旋转时的ROM分别进一步降至20 - 30%、23 - 27%和50 - 68%。本研究结果表明,与完整标本相比,所研究的铰接式动态稳定装置在双节段减压后可降低侧弯和屈伸时的ROM。在双节段减压并由此导致较大旋转不稳定后,该装置能够将轴向旋转运动恢复到完整运动节段范围内的值。