King Andrew J, Cowlishaw Guy
Institute of Zoology; Zoological Society of London; London, UK.
Commun Integr Biol. 2009;2(2):147-50. doi: 10.4161/cib.7562.
Social animals have to make a multitude of group decisions on a daily basis. At the most basic level, this will involve coordination of activities and travel directions. In groups of insects, birds and fish, much of this 'coordination' can be the result of relatively simple interaction patterns among group members. Such systems are self-organizing, and often do not require specific leaders, or followers. However, in more socially complex groups, achieving collective group action-a consensus-may not be accomplished by simple rules alone. Instead, a consensus may be reached by the averaging of preferences (democracy), or by following the choices of specific leaders (despotism). In this mini-review, we discuss the conditions necessary for despotism in animal groups, and focus upon new studies investigating coordinated actions in primates. We ask how specific leaders arise and why others follow them-providing new insight into the mechanisms of effective leadership in groups characterized by strong social relationships.
群居动物每天都要做出大量群体决策。在最基本的层面上,这将涉及活动协调和行进方向。在昆虫、鸟类和鱼类群体中,这种“协调”很大程度上可能是群体成员间相对简单的互动模式的结果。此类系统是自我组织的,通常不需要特定的领导者或追随者。然而,在社会结构更为复杂的群体中,要实现集体行动——达成共识——可能无法仅靠简单规则就能完成。相反,共识可能通过偏好平均(民主方式)达成,或者通过追随特定领导者的选择(专制方式)达成。在这篇小型综述中,我们讨论动物群体中专制所需的条件,并着重介绍研究灵长类动物协调行动的新研究。我们探讨特定领导者是如何产生的,以及其他个体为何追随他们——从而为具有紧密社会关系的群体中有效领导机制提供新见解。