Suppr超能文献

医疗保险 D 部分在一个以老年人群为基础的多种族社区中的参保情况。

Medicare part D enrollment in a biracial community-based population of older adults.

机构信息

Rush Institute for Healthy Aging, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612-3227, USA.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2009 Dec;49(6):828-38. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnp055. Epub 2009 Jun 16.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit (Part D) program debuted in January 2006. We ascertained the sociodemographic and health characteristics of Blacks and Whites who enrolled in the early stages of the program.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Data were collected between April 2006 and October 2007 from an ongoing population-based biracial study of older adults.

RESULTS

We interviewed 2,694 subjects, 1,784 Blacks and 910 Whites, of whom 40% and 35% reported to have enrolled in Medicare Part D, respectively. Among Blacks, those who enrolled were more likely to be female, unmarried, have less education and income, more medical conditions, greater physical disability, and poorer physical function than Blacks who did not enroll. Among Whites, enrollees were older, female, and had less education compared with White nonenrollees. In the multivariate analyses, older age, female, being married, lower income, worse physical function, and better cognitive function were associated with program enrollment.

IMPLICATIONS

These results indicate that the profiles of adults who initially enrolled in Medicare Part D differed somewhat by race. Program enrollment among Blacks was largely driven by financial need and poor health; however, among Whites, there was no such discernible pattern of enrollment. In addition, we observed a knowledge gap among Black nonenrollees who reported that they were unaware of and confused by the program and plans. The findings suggest that Medicare Part D may serve different needs in different subpopulations. The long-term impact of these differential program profiles on Black-White health disparities remains uncertain and requires continued monitoring.

摘要

目的

医疗保险处方药福利(Part D)计划于 2006 年 1 月推出。我们确定了在该计划早期阶段参加的黑人和白人的社会人口统计学和健康特征。

设计与方法

数据收集于 2006 年 4 月至 2007 年 10 月期间,来自一项正在进行的关于老年人的双种族人群研究。

结果

我们采访了 2694 名参与者,其中 1784 名黑人,910 名白人,分别有 40%和 35%的人报告参加了医疗保险 D 部分。在黑人中,参加者更有可能是女性、未婚、受教育程度和收入较低、更多的医疗状况、更大的身体残疾和较差的身体功能,而不是未参加者。在白人中,参加者比白人非参加者年龄更大、女性且受教育程度较低。在多变量分析中,年龄较大、女性、已婚、收入较低、身体功能较差和认知功能较好与计划参加有关。

意义

这些结果表明,最初参加医疗保险 D 部分的成年人的特征在一定程度上因种族而异。黑人参加该计划主要是出于经济需求和健康状况不佳;然而,在白人中,并没有这种明显的参保模式。此外,我们观察到黑人非参保者存在知识差距,他们表示自己不知道该计划,对该计划和计划感到困惑。这些发现表明,医疗保险 D 部分可能在不同的亚人群中满足不同的需求。这些不同的计划特征对黑人和白人健康差距的长期影响仍不确定,需要持续监测。

相似文献

1
Medicare part D enrollment in a biracial community-based population of older adults.
Gerontologist. 2009 Dec;49(6):828-38. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnp055. Epub 2009 Jun 16.
2
Medicare Part D low-income subsidies expanded in January 2024, but more needs to be done to ensure that eligible beneficiaries enroll.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Mar 1;30(3):279-289. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.23174. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
3
PDP or MA-PD? Medicare part D enrollment decisions in CMS Region 25.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2010 Jun;6(2):130-42. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.04.002.
7
Awareness of pharmaceutical cost-assistance programs among inner-city seniors.
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2009 Apr;7(2):117-29. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2009.04.003.
10
Prescription coverage, use and spending before and after Part D implementation: a national longitudinal panel study.
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jan;25(1):10-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1134-2. Epub 2009 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Medicare Part D beneficiaries' self-reported barriers to switching plans and making plan comparisons at all.
Health Aff Sch. 2024 Nov 2;2(11):qxae141. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae141. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Racial and ethnic disparities in Medicare Part D medication therapy management services utilization.
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023 Jan 11;9:100222. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100222. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Cost-related medication non-adherence among U.S. adults with diabetes.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Sep;143:24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.06.016. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
4
Impact of Medicare Part D on Racial and Ethnic Minorities.
Divers Equal Health Care. 2016;13(5):326-333. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
5
Discrepancies between cognition and decision making in older adults.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2016 Feb;28(1):99-108. doi: 10.1007/s40520-015-0375-7. Epub 2015 May 21.
6
Cognitive decline is associated with risk aversion and temporal discounting in older adults without dementia.
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 2;10(4):e0121900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121900. eCollection 2015.
7
Medicare beneficiary knowledge of the Part D program and its relationship with voluntary enrollment.
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2012 Dec 12;2(4). doi: 10.5600/mmrr.002.04.a03. eCollection 2012.
8
Racial differences in antilipemic use and lipid control in high-risk older adults: post-Medicare Part D.
Am Heart J. 2013 Oct;166(4):792-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
9
Recent trends in cost-related medication nonadherence among stroke survivors in the United States.
Ann Neurol. 2013 Feb;73(2):180-8. doi: 10.1002/ana.23823. Epub 2013 Feb 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Medicare Part D: how do vulnerable beneficiaries fare?
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2008 Apr;35:1-11.
2
Medicare Part D: a successful start with room for improvement.
JAMA. 2008 Apr 23;299(16):1954-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.16.1954.
5
The effect of the Medicare Part D prescription benefit on drug utilization and expenditures.
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Feb 5;148(3):169-77. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-3-200802050-00200. Epub 2008 Jan 7.
6
The impact of Medicare Part D on prescription drug use by the elderly.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Nov-Dec;26(6):1735-44. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.6.1735.
7
Medicare prescription drug benefit progress report: findings from a 2006 national survey of seniors.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Sep-Oct;26(5):w630-43. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.w630. Epub 2007 Aug 21.
9
Who failed to enroll in Medicare Part D, and why? Early results.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Sep-Oct;25(5):w344-54. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w344. Epub 2006 Aug 1.
10
The first months of the prescription-drug benefit--a CMS update.
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 1;354(22):2312-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp068108.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验