Suppr超能文献

200米快速步行试验与6分钟步行试验及最大心肺功能试验的比较:一项初步研究。

The 200-m fast-walk test compared with the 6-min walk test and the maximal cardiopulmonary test: a pilot study.

作者信息

Gremeaux Vincent, Deley G, Duclay J, Antoine D, Hannequin A, Casillas J M

机构信息

Pôle Rééducation-Réadaptation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon, France.

出版信息

Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Jul;88(7):571-8. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181aa416b.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The 200-m fast-walk test has been proposed as a high- intensity performance test in healthy, elderly subjects. Adaptation of low-risk coronary artery disease patients during this test were compared with those in a 6-min walk test and a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test.

DESIGN

Thirty patients with stable coronary artery disease (51.9 +/- 8.7 yrs), referred to the cardiac rehabilitation department, performed a cardiopulmonary exercise test, then a 200-m fast-walk test and a 6-min walk test in a random order, before and after the training period (6 wks, 3 days per week). Heart rate was monitored during each test. Peak workload of cardiopulmonary exercise test, distance walked on the 6-min walk test, and time to perform the 200-m fast-walk test were measured. A subsample of ten patients performed the exercise test with gas exchange measurements, with ventilatory threshold determination.

RESULTS

All subjects completed walk tests without complaint or incidents. Compared with the cardiopulmonary exercise test, the cardiac relative intensity was higher during the 200-m fast-walk test than during the 6-min walk test, both before (89.6% vs. 78.1% of cardiopulmonary exercise test maximal heart rate; P < 0.05) and after (83.8% vs. 74.3%; P < 0.05) training. Among the subsample of ten patients, the 200-m fast-walk test heart rate was significantly higher than the ventilatory threshold heart rate, which did not differ from the 6-min walk test heart rate. The 200-m fast-walk test time significantly decreased after training (-9.1%, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In patients with coronary artery disease at low risk, the 200-m fast-walk test explores higher levels of cardiorespiratory capacity than the 6-min walk test. Thus, this could be a useful field test in complement to the cardiopulmonary exercise test to assess functional capacity improvement and update training targets regularly during the course of high-intensity rehabilitation programs in this population.

摘要

目的

200米快速步行试验已被提议作为健康老年受试者的一项高强度性能测试。将低风险冠状动脉疾病患者在该测试中的适应性与6分钟步行试验和最大心肺运动试验中的适应性进行比较。

设计

30名稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者(年龄51.9±8.7岁)被转至心脏康复科,在训练期(6周,每周3天)前后,以随机顺序进行一次心肺运动试验、一次200米快速步行试验和一次6分钟步行试验。每次测试期间监测心率。测量心肺运动试验的峰值工作量、6分钟步行试验中行走的距离以及完成200米快速步行试验的时间。十名患者的一个子样本进行了气体交换测量的运动试验,并测定了通气阈值。

结果

所有受试者均顺利完成步行试验,无不适或意外情况。与心肺运动试验相比,200米快速步行试验期间的心脏相对强度在训练前(分别为心肺运动试验最大心率的89.6%和78.1%;P<0.05)和训练后(分别为83.8%和74.3%;P<0.05)均高于6分钟步行试验。在十名患者的子样本中,200米快速步行试验心率显著高于通气阈值心率,而通气阈值心率与6分钟步行试验心率无差异。训练后200米快速步行试验时间显著缩短(-9.1%,P<0.01)。

结论

在低风险冠状动脉疾病患者中,200米快速步行试验比6分钟步行试验能探索更高水平的心肺功能。因此,这可能是一项有用的现场测试,可作为心肺运动试验的补充,用于评估该人群高强度康复计划过程中的功能能力改善情况并定期更新训练目标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验