Stevenson Glenn W, Cormier Jim, Mercer Hannah, Adams Chloe, Dunbar Catherine, Negus S Stevens, Bilsky Edward J
Department of Psychology, University of New England, Biddeford, ME, 04005, United States.
Life Sci. 2009 Aug 12;85(7-8):309-15. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2009.06.006. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
Pain depresses expression of many behaviors, and one goal of analgesic treatment is to restore pain-depressed behaviors. Assays that focus on pain-depressed behaviors may contribute to preclinical assessment of candidate analgesics.
This study compared effects of the mu opioid receptor agonist morphine (an acknowledged analgesic), the dopamine receptor antagonist haloperidol (a non-analgesic sedative), the adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine (a non-analgesic stimulant) and the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist CJ 11,974-01 (a candidate analgesic) on acetic acid-induced writhing (a traditional pain-stimulated behavior) and acetic acid-induced suppression of locomotor activity (a pain-depressed behavior) in male ICR mice. Drug effects on non-depressed (baseline) locomotor activity were also examined.
I.P. administration of acetic acid (0.18-1%) was equipotent in stimulating writhing and depressing locomotor activity. Morphine blocked both acid-induced stimulation of writhing and depression of locomotion, although it was 56-fold less potent in the assay of acid-depressed locomotion. Haloperidol and CJ 11,974-01 decreased acid-stimulated writhing, but failed to block acid-induced depression of locomotion. Caffeine had no effect on acid-stimulated writhing or acid-depressed locomotor activity, although it did increase non-depressed locomotion. Thus, morphine was the only drug to block both acid-stimulated writhing and acid-depressed locomotion.
Complementary assays of pain-stimulated and pain-depressed behaviors may improve the predictive validity of preclinical studies that assess candidate analgesic drugs. The low potency of morphine to block acid-induced depression of locomotion suggests that locomotor activity may be a relatively insensitive measure for studies of pain-depressed behavior.
疼痛会抑制多种行为的表现,而镇痛治疗的一个目标就是恢复受疼痛抑制的行为。专注于受疼痛抑制行为的检测方法可能有助于对候选镇痛药进行临床前评估。
本研究比较了μ阿片受体激动剂吗啡(一种公认的镇痛药)、多巴胺受体拮抗剂氟哌啶醇(一种非镇痛性镇静剂)、腺苷受体拮抗剂咖啡因(一种非镇痛性兴奋剂)以及神经激肽-1受体拮抗剂CJ 11,974-01(一种候选镇痛药)对雄性ICR小鼠醋酸诱导扭体(一种传统的疼痛刺激行为)和醋酸诱导的运动活动抑制(一种受疼痛抑制的行为)的影响。还检测了药物对未受抑制(基线)运动活动的影响。
腹腔注射醋酸(0.18 - 1%)在刺激扭体和抑制运动活动方面具有同等效力。吗啡可阻断酸诱导的扭体刺激和运动抑制,尽管在酸诱导的运动抑制检测中其效力低56倍。氟哌啶醇和CJ 11,974-01可减少酸刺激的扭体,但未能阻断酸诱导的运动抑制。咖啡因对酸刺激的扭体或酸诱导的运动活动抑制无影响,尽管它确实增加了未受抑制的运动。因此,吗啡是唯一能同时阻断酸刺激的扭体和酸诱导的运动抑制的药物。
对疼痛刺激和受疼痛抑制行为的互补检测方法可能会提高评估候选镇痛药的临床前研究的预测效度。吗啡阻断酸诱导的运动抑制的效力较低,这表明运动活动可能是研究受疼痛抑制行为的相对不敏感指标。