Dougherty Michael J
ASHG, 9650 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
Am J Hum Genet. 2009 Jul;85(1):6-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.05.010. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
Over the past 20 years, the focus of national efforts to improve K-12 science education has ranged from curriculum and professional development of teachers to the adoption of science standards and high-stakes testing. In spite of this work, students in the United States continue to lag behind their peers in other countries. This underperformance is true for genetics, as well as for science and math in general, and is particularly worrisome given the accelerating need for scientists and engineers in our increasingly technology-driven economy. A scientifically literate public is essential if citizens are to engage effectively with policymakers on issues of scientific importance. Perhaps nowhere is this conjunction more personally meaningful than in human genetics and medicine. Rapid changes in our field have the potential to revolutionize healthcare, but the public is ill prepared to participate in this transformation. One potential solution is to modernize the genetics curriculum so that it matches the science of the 21(st) century. This paper highlights changes in human genetics that support a curricular reorganization, outlines the problems with current genetics instruction, and proposes a new genetics curriculum.
在过去20年里,国家为改善从幼儿园到12年级的科学教育所做努力的重点,涵盖了从课程设置、教师专业发展到科学标准的采用以及高风险测试等方面。尽管开展了这些工作,但美国学生在科学方面仍然落后于其他国家的同龄人。这种表现不佳在遗传学领域如此,在科学和数学总体上也是如此,而且鉴于在我们日益技术驱动的经济中对科学家和工程师的需求不断加速,这尤其令人担忧。如果公民要在具有科学重要性的问题上有效地与政策制定者互动,具备科学素养的公众至关重要。也许在人类遗传学和医学领域,这种关联比其他任何地方都更具个人意义。我们这个领域的快速变化有可能彻底改变医疗保健,但公众却没有做好参与这一变革的准备。一个潜在的解决方案是使遗传学课程现代化,使其与21世纪的科学相匹配。本文着重介绍了支持课程重组的人类遗传学方面的变化,概述了当前遗传学教学存在的问题,并提出了新的遗传学课程。