Zhou Yong-Gang, Zhang Qiang, Wang Yan
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, General Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Beijing 100853, China.
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Feb 1;47(3):172-6.
To evaluate the medium-term clinical results of reconstruction of the severe acetabular bone defect by using metal mesh and impaction bone grafting (IBG) technique, as well as to emphasize the importance of Paprosky acetabular bone defect classification system in assessing the severity of bone defect and to analyse the failure reasons.
Between December 1998 and December 2007, 67 total hip arthroplasty (THA) revisions were made by using IBG technique to reconstruct severe acetabular bone defects combining with metal mesh or meta mesh cup on 63 patients. All the defects were combined defect (AAOS Type 3). There were 20 Paprosky II B defects in 19 patients, 28 Paprosky II C defects in 29 patients and 13 Paprosky II A defects in 12 patients. Regular follow-ups, involving the assessments of Harris hip scoring system, clinical efficacy, imaging and complications, were subsequently made.
Sixty-one hips in 58 patients gained an average of 63 months (8-107) follow-up. Harris hip score increased from an average of 41.7 points (21-52) preoperatively to an average of 89.2 points (81-98) at the last follow-up, with an excellent and good rate of 93%. Radiographically, there were no loosening cases excluding the 3 dislocated polyethylene cups from the metal mesh cups. One case was failed to reconstruction the height of normal hip center, in which metal mesh cup was used for enforce the medial wall. Dislocations occurred in 3 hips, 1 of these patients required an open reduction and the other 2 dislocations only need close reduction. Postoperative infection rate was 1.6% (1 case), two stage revision with another IBG procedure succeeded in this patient.
IBG combing with metal mesh for reconstruction of severe acetabular bone defect is an ideal technology. Paprosky acetabular bone defect classification system is very important in IBG procedure besides AAOS acetabular bone defect classification system to evaluate the severity of bone defect and to compare the outcomes between different authors. The use of metal mesh cup should be avoided to enforce acetabular medial wall in patients with severe acetabular bone defect.
评估采用金属网与打压植骨(IBG)技术重建严重髋臼骨缺损的中期临床效果,强调帕罗斯基髋臼骨缺损分类系统在评估骨缺损严重程度中的重要性,并分析失败原因。
1998年12月至2007年12月期间,对63例患者采用IBG技术联合金属网或金属网杯重建严重髋臼骨缺损,共进行了67例全髋关节置换术(THA)翻修。所有缺损均为复合缺损(AAOS 3型)。其中19例患者有20处帕罗斯基II B型缺损,29例患者有28处帕罗斯基II C型缺损,12例患者有13处帕罗斯基II A型缺损。随后进行定期随访,包括Harris髋关节评分系统评估、临床疗效、影像学检查及并发症评估。
58例患者的61髋平均获得63个月(8 - 107个月)的随访。Harris髋关节评分从术前平均41.7分(21 - 52分)提高到末次随访时的平均89.2分(81 - 98分),优良率为93%。影像学检查显示,除3例金属网杯内聚乙烯杯脱位外,无松动病例。1例患者未能重建正常髋关节中心高度,该患者使用金属网杯加强内侧壁。3髋发生脱位,其中1例患者需要切开复位,另外2例脱位仅需闭合复位。术后感染率为1.6%(1例),该患者通过再次行IBG手术的二期翻修获得成功。
IBG联合金属网重建严重髋臼骨缺损是一种理想的技术。除AAOS髋臼骨缺损分类系统外,帕罗斯基髋臼骨缺损分类系统在IBG手术中对于评估骨缺损严重程度以及比较不同作者的治疗结果非常重要。对于严重髋臼骨缺损患者,应避免使用金属网杯加强髋臼内侧壁。