Simmons Steven O, Fan Chun-Yang, Ramabhadran Ram
Integrated Systems Toxicology Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, USA.
Toxicol Sci. 2009 Oct;111(2):202-25. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfp140. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
High costs, long test times, and societal concerns related to animal use have required the development of in vitro assays for the rapid and cost-effective toxicological evaluation and characterization of compounds in both the pharmaceutical and environmental arenas. Although the pharmaceutical industry has developed very effective, high-throughput in vitro assays for determining the therapeutic potential of compounds, the application of this approach to toxicological screening has been limited. A primary reason for this is that while drug candidate screens are directed to a specific target/mechanism, xenobiotics can cause toxicity through any of a myriad of undefined interactions with cellular components and processes. Given that it is not practical to design assays that can interrogate each potential toxicological target, an integrative approach is required if there is to be a rapid and low-cost toxicological evaluation of chemicals. Cellular stress response pathways offer a viable solution to the creation of a set of integrative assays as there is a limited and hence manageable set (a small ensemble of 10 or less) of major cellular stress response pathways through which cells mount a homoeostatic response to toxicants and which also participate in cell fate/death decisions. Further, over the past decades, these pathways have been well characterized at a molecular level thereby enabling the development of high-throughput cell-based assays using the components of the pathways. Utilization of the set of cellular stress response pathway-based assays as indicators of toxic interactions of chemicals with basic cellular machinery will potentially permit the clustering of chemicals based on biological response profiles of common mode of action (MOA) and also the inference of the specific MOA of a toxicant. This article reviews the biochemical characteristics of the stress response pathways, their common architecture that enables rapid activation during stress, their participation in cell fate decisions, the essential nature of these pathways to the organism, and the biochemical basis of their cross-talk that permits an assay ensemble screening approach. Subsequent sections describe how the stress pathway ensemble assay approach could be applied to screening potentially toxic compounds and discuss how this approach may be used to derive toxicant MOA from the biological activity profiles that the ensemble strategy provides. The article concludes with a review of the application of the stress assay concept to noninvasive in vivo assessments of chemical toxicants.
高昂的成本、漫长的测试时间以及与动物使用相关的社会问题,都要求开发体外试验方法,以便在制药和环境领域对化合物进行快速且经济高效的毒理学评估和特性鉴定。尽管制药行业已开发出非常有效的高通量体外试验方法来确定化合物的治疗潜力,但这种方法在毒理学筛选中的应用却很有限。造成这种情况的一个主要原因是,虽然候选药物筛选针对特定的靶点/机制,但外源性物质可通过与细胞成分和过程的无数未定义相互作用中的任何一种来导致毒性。鉴于设计能够检测每个潜在毒理学靶点的试验并不实际,因此如果要对化学品进行快速且低成本的毒理学评估,就需要一种综合方法。细胞应激反应途径为创建一组综合试验提供了可行的解决方案,因为主要的细胞应激反应途径数量有限(10个或更少的小集合),因此易于管理,细胞通过这些途径对毒物产生稳态反应,并且这些途径也参与细胞命运/死亡的决定。此外,在过去几十年中,这些途径在分子水平上已得到充分表征,从而能够利用途径的组成部分开发基于细胞的高通量试验。利用基于细胞应激反应途径的试验集作为化学品与基本细胞机制毒性相互作用的指标,有可能根据共同作用模式(MOA)的生物学反应谱对化学品进行聚类,还能推断毒物的特定MOA。本文综述了应激反应途径的生化特性、它们在应激期间能够快速激活的共同结构、它们在细胞命运决定中的参与、这些途径对生物体的本质重要性以及它们相互作用的生化基础,这种相互作用允许采用试验集筛选方法。后续章节描述了应激途径试验集方法如何应用于筛选潜在有毒化合物,并讨论了如何利用这种方法从试验集策略提供的生物学活性谱中推导毒物的MOA。本文最后回顾了应激试验概念在化学毒物非侵入性体内评估中的应用。