Suppr超能文献

松花粉的变应原性和交叉反应性。

Allergenicity and cross-reactivity of pine pollen.

作者信息

Gastaminza G, Lombardero M, Bernaola G, Antepara I, Muñoz D, Gamboa P M, Audicana M T, Marcos C, Ansotegui I J

机构信息

Hospital Santiago Apóstol, Unidad de Alergología, Vitoria, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Exp Allergy. 2009 Sep;39(9):1438-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03308.x. Epub 2009 Jul 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pine pollen has long been considered a non-allergenic pollen. The large size of the grain and its low levels of proteins are the main reasons invoked to explain this low allergenicity. The aim of this study was to describe the main allergenic bands of Pinus radiata (PR) and its cross-reactivity with other pine species, other conifers and grass pollen.

METHODS

Sixty-five pine-pollen-allergic patients (51% also sensitized to grass pollen) were studied. Skin prick tests (SPT) to a battery of allergens including PR, Pinus pinea, Pinus sylvestris, Pinus nigra and Cupressus sempervirens pollens and specific IgE determination to PR and Pinus strobus were performed. IgE-immunoblotting to a PR extract and other pine pollens was also carried out. UniCAP inhibition and immunoblotting inhibition studies were performed to assess the cross-reactivity between different pollens.

RESULTS

The SPTs were positive with all the pine pollen extracts tested in 69% of the patients. Specific IgE was positive to PR or P. strobus in 77% of the patients, and to Lolium perenne in 51%. Nine different allergenic bands were detected. The two main allergens were a 42 kDa band recognized by 85% of the patients and a band of approximately 6-8 kDa recognized by 40%. A high degree of cross-reactivity was observed between different pine pollen species, but not between pines and C. sempervirens pollen. A partial cross-reactivity could be seen between pine and grass pollens only in patients also sensitized to L. perenne.

CONCLUSIONS

Pine pollen should be considered as a potential allergenic pollen especially where this pollen is abundant. The detection of a high number of patients that were monosensitized to pine pollen suggests the possibility of treating these patients with specific immunotherapy.

摘要

背景

长期以来,松花粉一直被认为是一种非致敏性花粉。花粉颗粒较大且蛋白质含量低是其致敏性低的主要原因。本研究旨在描述辐射松(PR)的主要致敏条带及其与其他松树种、其他针叶树花粉和草花粉的交叉反应性。

方法

对65例对松花粉过敏的患者(其中51%也对草花粉致敏)进行了研究。对包括PR、欧洲赤松、欧洲黑松、海岸松和地中海柏木花粉在内的一系列过敏原进行了皮肤点刺试验(SPT),并测定了对PR和北美乔松的特异性IgE。还对PR提取物和其他松花粉进行了IgE免疫印迹分析。进行了UniCAP抑制试验和免疫印迹抑制试验,以评估不同花粉之间的交叉反应性。

结果

69%的患者对所有测试的松花粉提取物的SPT均呈阳性。77%的患者对PR或北美乔松的特异性IgE呈阳性,51%的患者对黑麦草的特异性IgE呈阳性。检测到9条不同的致敏条带。两种主要过敏原是一条42 kDa的条带,85%的患者可识别,另一条约6 - 8 kDa的条带,40%的患者可识别。不同松花粉种之间观察到高度的交叉反应性,但松树与地中海柏木花粉之间没有交叉反应性。仅在也对黑麦草致敏的患者中,松花粉和草花粉之间可观察到部分交叉反应性。

结论

松花粉应被视为一种潜在的致敏花粉,尤其是在该花粉数量丰富的地区。大量对松花粉单致敏患者的发现提示了用特异性免疫疗法治疗这些患者的可能性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验