Phisitkul Phinit, Chaichankul Chaisiri, Sripongsai Ratthapol, Prasitdamrong Ittipol, Tengtrakulcharoen Pannipa, Suarchawaratana Siripim
Department of Orthopaedics, Phramongkutklao Hospital and College of Medicine, 315 Ratchawithi Rd., Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Foot Ankle Int. 2009 Jul;30(7):690-5. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2009.0690.
In the assessment of lateral ankle instability, the anterior drawer test has been found to be inaccurate and the focus on pure anterior translation cannot properly perceive the anterolateral rotatory nature of the talar displacement. In order to address this, the anterolateral drawer test can be done with digital palpation of the talar displacement anterolaterally with a controlled angle of plantarflexion as well as application of the translational force.
We evaluated the anterolateral drawer test and the original anterior drawer test in 10 fresh below-the-knee specimens using a direct anatomic measurement (DAM) loaded by a Telos stress device as a reference. Specimens were assigned into three groups: intact ligaments, ATFL-cut, and ATFL&CFL-cut. The examiners were blinded with one performing the anterolateral drawer test (E1) while the other performed the original anterior drawer test (E2).
Pearson's correlation coefficient indicated a statistically significant linear relationship between DAM/E1 r = 0.931, p < 0.001 but not between DAM/E2 r = 0.519, p = 0.124. Intraclass correlation coefficient show correlation between DAM/E1 and DAM/E2 to be 0.945 (p < 0.001) and 0.683 (p = 0.051). When 3 mm or more was used as the threshold to diagnose a lateral ligament rupture, sensitivity and specificity were E1(100%, 100%) and E2(75%, 50%).
The anterolateral drawer test showed high accuracy in the determination of lateral ankle instability and in the diagnosis of a ligament rupture.
Further investigation regarding the accuracy and reliability of this test in comparison with the original anterior drawer test is warranted in a patient population with ankle instability.
在评估外侧踝关节不稳时,已发现前抽屉试验不准确,且单纯关注向前平移无法正确察觉距骨移位的前外侧旋转性质。为解决这一问题,可在控制跖屈角度并施加平移力的同时,通过对距骨前外侧移位进行数字触诊来进行前外侧抽屉试验。
我们使用Telos应力装置加载的直接解剖测量(DAM)作为参考,对10个新鲜的膝下标本进行了前外侧抽屉试验和原始前抽屉试验评估。标本分为三组:韧带完整组、距腓前韧带切断组和距腓前韧带与跟腓韧带切断组。检查者不知情,一人进行前外侧抽屉试验(E1),另一人进行原始前抽屉试验(E2)。
Pearson相关系数表明,DAM/E1之间存在统计学显著的线性关系(r = 0.931,p < 0.001),而DAM/E2之间不存在(r = 0.519,p = 0.124)。组内相关系数显示,DAM/E1与DAM/E2之间的相关性分别为0.945(p < 0.001)和0.683(p = 0.051)。当以3mm或更大作为诊断外侧韧带断裂的阈值时,敏感性和特异性分别为E1(100%,100%)和E2(75%,50%)。
前外侧抽屉试验在确定外侧踝关节不稳和诊断韧带断裂方面显示出高准确性。
对于踝关节不稳的患者群体,有必要进一步研究该试验与原始前抽屉试验相比的准确性和可靠性。