Sobol W, Rossner S, Hinson B, Hiltbrandt E, Karstaedt N, Santago P, Wolfman N, Hagaman A, Crouse J R
Department of Radiology, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27103.
Int J Obes. 1991 Sep;15(9):589-99.
We have developed a new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol to quantitate intraabdominal and subcutaneous fat and have validated it by comparing measurements of fat areas by MRI with those obtained by computed tomography (CT) in 11 asymptomatic volunteers who all had a single CT and MRI image taken at the level of the umbilicus. The new MRI protocol was based on a water-fat separation method by which the slice selection routines excite water and fat protons in different positions along the slice select direction. This method performed more reliably than earlier methods based on phase differences between water and fat signals. Fat areas measured by MRI exceeded those measured by CT by 8-22 percent, and fat areas and ratios obtained by MRI correlated well with CT (r = 0.98 for areas and, for ratios, r = 0.81). The ratio of intraabdominal/subcutaneous fat measured by MRI in seven males was significantly greater than that in four females. We also compared the new method with a previously published inversion recovery (IR) method in seven additional volunteers. Agreement between the two methods was excellent, and the major differences were technical: the IR protocol produced images that may require custom image processing programs when obtained on some scanners. Comparability of the two methods provides further reassurance of the validity of both. MRI presents an attractive opportunity for directly measuring intraabdominal fat in order to correlate this with metabolic parameters and to visualize changes during weight loss.
我们开发了一种新的磁共振成像(MRI)方案来定量测量腹部内和皮下脂肪,并通过在11名无症状志愿者中比较MRI测量的脂肪面积与计算机断层扫描(CT)获得的脂肪面积进行了验证,这些志愿者均在脐部水平进行了单次CT和MRI成像。新的MRI方案基于水脂分离方法,通过该方法,切片选择程序在切片选择方向上的不同位置激发水和脂肪质子。该方法比基于水和脂肪信号相位差的早期方法表现得更可靠。MRI测量的脂肪面积比CT测量的脂肪面积超出8%-22%,并且MRI获得的脂肪面积和比率与CT相关性良好(面积r = 0.98,比率r = 0.81)。7名男性中MRI测量的腹内/皮下脂肪比率显著高于4名女性。我们还在另外7名志愿者中将新方法与先前发表的反转恢复(IR)方法进行了比较。两种方法之间的一致性非常好,主要差异在于技术方面:IR方案产生的图像在某些扫描仪上获取时可能需要定制图像处理程序。两种方法的可比性进一步确保了两者的有效性。MRI为直接测量腹部内脂肪提供了一个有吸引力的机会,以便将其与代谢参数相关联,并可视化减肥过程中的变化。