Barone Lavinia, Guiducci Valentina
Psychology Department, University of Pavia, Italy.
Attach Hum Dev. 2009 Jul;11(4):405-17. doi: 10.1080/14616730902814770.
Mental representations of attachment in a sample of adults with Eating Disorders (ED) were assessed using the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI). Sixty subjects participated in the study: 30 non-clinical and 30 clinical. The results obtained showed a specific distribution of attachment patterns in the clinical sample: 10% Free/Autonomous (F), 47% Insecure-Dismissing (Ds), 17% Insecure-Entangled/Preoccupied (E) and about 26% disorganized (CC/U). The two samples differed in their attachment pattern distribution and were significantly different on some coding system scales. Further information was obtained by analyzing differences between the three ED subtypes considered (i.e. Anorexia Nervosa, Bulimia Nervosa and Binge Eating Disorder) and by investigating the differential role of the two parental figures in the definition of attachment representations. Results showed potential benefits in using the AAI coding system scales in addition to the main classifications in order to understand better the developmental issues involved in these disorders. Implications for developmental research and clinical nosology are discussed.
使用成人依恋访谈(AAI)对一组饮食失调(ED)成年人的依恋心理表征进行了评估。60名受试者参与了该研究:30名非临床受试者和30名临床受试者。所得结果显示了临床样本中依恋模式的特定分布:10%为自由/自主型(F),47%为不安全-忽视型(Ds),17%为不安全-缠结/专注型(E),约26%为混乱型(CC/U)。两个样本在依恋模式分布上存在差异,并且在一些编码系统量表上有显著差异。通过分析所考虑的三种饮食失调亚型(即神经性厌食症、神经性贪食症和暴饮暴食症)之间的差异,以及通过研究两位父母形象在依恋表征定义中的不同作用,获得了更多信息。结果表明,除了主要分类之外,使用AAI编码系统量表可能有助于更好地理解这些疾病所涉及的发展问题。文中讨论了对发展研究和临床疾病分类学的意义。