Suppr超能文献

缬沙坦改善高血压患者的内皮功能障碍:一项随机双盲研究。

Valsartan improves endothelial dysfunction in hypertension: a randomized, double-blind study.

作者信息

Tzemos Nikolaos, Lim Pitt O, MacDonald Thomas M

机构信息

Hypertension Research Centre, Division of Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Ther. 2009 Fall;27(3):151-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5922.2009.00085.x. Epub 2009 Jul 14.

Abstract

Endothelial dysfunction can predict cardiac outcomes in hypertension and reversing this abnormality has become an attractive therapeutic objective. We tested the hypothesis that blocking the angiotensin type 1 (AT(1)) receptor with valsartan in comparison with amlodipine would lead to an improvement in forearm resistance artery endothelial dysfunction. In total, 25 hypertensive subjects (mean age 60 years, SD 8) with a mean daytime ambulatory blood pressure (BP) of 154 (10)/97 (6) mmHg were randomized following a 3-week placebo run-in period to a double-blind, crossover trial of 16-week treatment periods with either valsartan or amlodipine, separated by a 3-week washout period. Intra-arterial infusions of acetylcholine (ACh) and N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) were used to assess stimulated and basal endothelium-dependent nitric oxide (NO) release, respectively. Coinfusion of ACh and L-NMMA was employed to investigate the existence of an NO-independent vasodilatory pathway. Valsartan and amlodipine each lowered the clinical BP to the same extent (139 [7]/87 [6] and 139 [11]/89 [4] mmHg, respectively). The vasodilatory response to ACh was significantly increased with valsartan (maximal percentage change in forearm blood flow (max. DeltaFBF%) 301 [47] vs. 185 [34], mean [SEM]; P < 0.05) as compared with placebo, but remained unchanged with amlodipine. Both valsartan and amlodipine similarly increased the vasoconstrictive response to L-NMMA (max. DeltaFBF%-43 [5], -42 [5], respectively, vs. -26 [3] baseline; P < 0.001). The vasodilatory response after coinfusion of ACh and L-NMMA was significantly (P < 0.05) enhanced only with valsartan. Valsartan reserved peripheral endothelial dysfunction through both NO-dependent and -independent pathways, while for the same degree of BP control, amlodipine had only a partial effect on NO bioactivity.

摘要

血管内皮功能障碍能够预测高血压患者的心脏预后,逆转这一异常情况已成为一个颇具吸引力的治疗目标。我们检验了这样一个假设:与氨氯地平相比,使用缬沙坦阻断1型血管紧张素(AT(1))受体可改善前臂阻力动脉的内皮功能障碍。共有25名高血压患者(平均年龄60岁,标准差8),其日间动态血压平均值为154(10)/97(6)mmHg,在经过3周的安慰剂导入期后,被随机分配到一项双盲、交叉试验中,接受为期16周的缬沙坦或氨氯地平治疗,两个治疗期之间有3周的洗脱期。通过动脉内输注乙酰胆碱(ACh)和N(G)-单甲基-L-精氨酸(L-NMMA),分别评估刺激后和基础状态下内皮依赖性一氧化氮(NO)的释放。联合输注ACh和L-NMMA用于研究是否存在不依赖NO的血管舒张途径。缬沙坦和氨氯地平降低临床血压的程度相同(分别为139(7)/87(6)mmHg和139(11)/89(4)mmHg)。与安慰剂相比,缬沙坦使对ACh的血管舒张反应显著增强(前臂血流量最大百分比变化(最大ΔFBF%)为301(47)对185(34),平均值[标准误];P<0.05),而氨氯地平则无变化。缬沙坦和氨氯地平同样增加了对L-NMMA的血管收缩反应(最大ΔFBF%分别为-43(5)、-42(5),而基线时为-26(3);P<0.001)。仅缬沙坦使联合输注ACh和L-NMMA后的血管舒张反应显著增强(P<0.05)。缬沙坦通过依赖NO和不依赖NO的途径改善外周内皮功能障碍,而在血压控制程度相同的情况下,氨氯地平对NO生物活性仅有部分作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e68/2948429/405a943ee0fd/cdr0027-0151-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验