Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, USA.
Head Neck. 2010 Jan;32(1):26-37. doi: 10.1002/hed.21143.
We describe the development and validation of the Vanderbilt Head and Neck Symptom Survey (VHNSS), which was designed to screen for tumor- and treatment-specific symptoms in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing concurrent chemoradiation (CCR).
Using a 2-step card sort method, we identified high-impact and high-frequency toxicities in patients with head and neck cancer treated with CCR. This resulted in a 28-item questionnaire which scores symptoms on a 0 to 10 scale (none to severe). The tool was validated using data collected from 5 supportive care studies comprising a total sample of 332 patients with head and neck cancer.
Responses to the VHNSS items demonstrated a very consistent pattern (Cronbach's alpha = 0.943) with each item contributing substantially to the global index. Five symptom subscales were identified including "Nutrition," "Pain," "Voice," "Swallow," and "Mucous/Dry Mouth." Each of the cluster scores demonstrated good internal consistency. The pattern of associations between the VHNSS and established tools indicated appropriate convergence and divergence. Comparison of global and subscale scores and objective measure were also in the expected direction providing further evidence of validity.
The findings provide support that the VHNSS is a valid and reliable tool to assess head and neck-specific symptom burden and function loss. Further research to evaluate this screening tool as a part of a systems approach to supportive care is warranted.
我们描述了范德比尔特头颈部症状调查(VHNSS)的开发和验证,该调查旨在筛选接受同期放化疗(CCR)的头颈部癌症患者的肿瘤和治疗特异性症状。
使用两步卡片分类法,我们确定了接受 CCR 治疗的头颈部癌症患者的高影响和高频率毒性。这导致了一个 28 项的问卷,对症状进行 0 到 10 分(无到严重)的评分。该工具通过来自 5 项支持性护理研究的数据进行了验证,这些研究总共包含了 332 名头颈部癌症患者。
VHNSS 项目的反应表现出非常一致的模式(Cronbach's alpha = 0.943),每个项目对全球指数都有很大的贡献。确定了五个症状亚量表,包括“营养”、“疼痛”、“声音”、“吞咽”和“粘液/口干”。每个聚类评分都表现出良好的内部一致性。VHNSS 与既定工具之间的关联模式表明了适当的收敛和发散。全球和亚量表评分与客观测量之间的比较也符合预期,进一步证明了有效性。
这些发现支持 VHNSS 是评估头颈部特定症状负担和功能丧失的有效和可靠工具。需要进一步研究来评估这个筛查工具作为支持性护理系统方法的一部分。