O'Regan H J, Reynolds S C
Research Centre in Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology, School of Natural Sciences and Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK. h.j.o'
J Hum Evol. 2009 Sep;57(3):212-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.04.002. Epub 2009 Aug 3.
The southern African late Pliocene to early Pleistocene carnivore guild was much larger than that of the present day. Understanding how this guild may have functioned is important for the reconstruction of carnivore-hominin interactions and to assess the potential for hominin scavenging in southern Africa. In modern ecosystems, the coexistence of larger carnivore species is constrained by several factors, which include high levels of interspecific competition. Here, the composition of the fossil carnivore guild is examined using Sterkfontein Member 4 (Cradle of Humankind, South Africa) as a case study. Sterkfontein Member 4 contains 10 larger carnivore taxa (body mass >21.5 kg) and may also contain two Australopithecus species. Two possible causes of higher numbers of carnivore species in the South African fossil record are initially considered. First, that there is a bias introduced through comparing assemblages of differing sizes; second, carnivore biodiversity may have been artificially inflated due to previous taxonomic splitting of carnivore species, such as Crocuta. These possibilities are rejected and modern ecological data are used to construct a simple spatial model to determine how many carnivores could have co-existed. Although the resulting model indicates that the carnivore taxa present in Member 4 could have co-occurred, modern ecological studies indicate that it is highly unlikely that they would have co-existed simultaneously. Considering the complex depositional processes that operate in the southern African cave sites, it is proposed that the larger carnivore guild observed in the Sterkfontein Member 4 fossil assemblage is a palimpsest created by time-averaging. In light of this, we suggest that sites which have a large number of carnivore taxa should be examined for time-averaging, while those sites which have relatively few species may be a better reflection of carnivore communities.
上新世晚期到更新世早期的南部非洲食肉动物群落比现今的要大得多。了解这个群落的运作方式对于重建食肉动物与古人类的相互作用以及评估南部非洲古人类 scavenging 的可能性至关重要。在现代生态系统中,较大食肉动物物种的共存受到多种因素的限制,其中包括高水平的种间竞争。在此,以斯特克方丹4号成员(南非人类摇篮)为案例研究,对化石食肉动物群落的组成进行了研究。斯特克方丹4号成员包含10个较大的食肉动物分类单元(体重>21.5千克),还可能包含两种南方古猿物种。最初考虑了南非化石记录中食肉动物物种数量较多的两个可能原因。第一,通过比较不同大小的组合引入了偏差;第二,食肉动物的生物多样性可能由于先前对食肉动物物种(如斑鬣狗)的分类划分而被人为夸大。这些可能性被排除,利用现代生态数据构建了一个简单的空间模型,以确定有多少食肉动物能够共存。尽管所得模型表明4号成员中存在的食肉动物分类单元可能同时出现,但现代生态研究表明它们极不可能同时共存。考虑到南部非洲洞穴遗址中复杂的沉积过程,有人提出在斯特克方丹4号成员化石组合中观察到的较大食肉动物群落是由时间平均形成的叠印本。鉴于此,我们建议对拥有大量食肉动物分类单元的遗址进行时间平均检查,而那些物种相对较少的遗址可能更能反映食肉动物群落。 (注:scavenging 在文中可能是特定的专业术语,暂保留英文未翻译,需根据具体专业内容确定准确译法)