Zanner R, Pilge S, Kochs E F, Kreuzer M, Schneider G
Department of Anaesthesiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich D-81675, Germany.
Br J Anaesth. 2009 Sep;103(3):394-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep198. Epub 2009 Jul 31.
Monitoring of anaesthetic depth with EEG-derived indices may detect EEG changes associated with awareness and thereby help to decrease the incidence of intraoperative awareness with postoperative recall. All currently available monitors need varying time periods to calculate a new index when reacting to changes in anaesthetic depth. The exact time delay for calculation of new index values is unknown. In a previous study, we used simulated EEG signals and found considerable time lags for the cerebral state index (Danmeter, Odense, Denmark), the bispectral index (Aspect Medical Systems Inc., Newton, MA, USA), and the Narcotrend index (MonitorTechnik, Bad Bramstedt, Germany). The aim of this study was to investigate whether the time delays observed with simulated EEG signals also applied to real EEG data.
We used perioperatively recorded EEG data from a database corresponding to the awake state, general anaesthesia, and suppression of cortical activity, respectively. After a switch from one state of consciousness to another, the time necessary for all indices to adjust the index value to the underlying input signal was measured.
We found time delays for all indices between 24 (7) and 122 (23) s before the new state was indicated. In accordance with our previous results, these time delays were not constant and depended on the particular starting and target index value. Results were different for decreasing and increasing values.
Our results may show a limitation of the value of electronic EEG indices in prevention of awareness with recall. Furthermore, due to different time delays for ascending and descending values, the results of pharmacodynamic studies may be influenced by this phenomenon.
使用脑电图衍生指标监测麻醉深度可检测与术中知晓相关的脑电图变化,从而有助于降低术中知晓伴术后回忆的发生率。所有现有的监测仪在对麻醉深度变化做出反应时,计算新指标所需的时间各不相同。计算新指标值的确切时间延迟尚不清楚。在之前的一项研究中,我们使用模拟脑电图信号,发现脑状态指数(丹麦丹梅特公司)、脑电双频指数(美国马萨诸塞州牛顿市阿斯派克医疗系统公司)和脑电意识深度指数(德国巴特布拉姆斯泰特市监测技术公司)存在相当大的时间滞后。本研究的目的是调查在模拟脑电图信号中观察到的时间延迟是否也适用于真实的脑电图数据。
我们使用了来自一个数据库的围手术期记录的脑电图数据,分别对应清醒状态、全身麻醉和皮质活动抑制。从一种意识状态转换到另一种意识状态后,测量所有指标将指标值调整到基础输入信号所需的时间。
我们发现在指示新状态之前,所有指标的时间延迟在24(7)秒至122(23)秒之间。与我们之前的结果一致,这些时间延迟并非恒定不变,而是取决于特定的起始和目标指标值。下降值和上升值的结果不同。
我们的结果可能显示了电子脑电图指标在预防术中知晓伴回忆方面的价值存在局限性。此外,由于上升和下降值的时间延迟不同,药效学研究的结果可能会受到这一现象的影响。