Tan Hiangkiat, Sarawate Chaitanya, Singer Joseph, Elward Kurt, Cohen Rubin I, Smart Brian A, Busk Michael F, Lustig James, O'Brien Jeana D, Schatz Michael
Health Outcomes Research, HealthCore, Wilmington, DE 19801, USA.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2009 Aug;84(8):675-84. doi: 10.4065/84.8.675.
To comprehensively evaluate clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes associated with various therapeutic classes of asthma controller medications.
This observational study, which used administrative claims data from US commercial health plans, included patients with asthma aged 18 through 64 years who filled a prescription for at least 1 asthma controller medication from September 1, 2003, through August 31, 2005. Outcome metrics included the use of short-acting beta-agonists (SABAs), the use of oral corticosteroids, inpatient (INP)/emergency department (ED) visits, and asthma-related health care costs. A subset of 5000 patients was randomly selected for a survey using the Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire, and the Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire.
Of 56,168 eligible patients, 823 returned completed questionnaires. Compared with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), leukotriene modifiers (LMs) were associated with lower odds of INP/ED visits (odds ratio [OR], 0.80; P<.001), lower odds of using 6 or more SABA canisters (OR, 0.81; P<.001), and higher annual cost ($193; P<.001). In the subgroup analysis of adherent patients, LMs were associated with higher odds of INP/ED visits (OR, 1.74; P=.04), lower odds of using 6 or more SABA canisters (OR, 0.46; P<.001), and higher annual cost ($235; P<.001). Inhaled corticosteroids and LMs had a comparable impact on all patient-reported outcomes. For combination therapy, ICS plus a long-acting beta-agonist consistently showed at least equivalent or better outcomes in the use of SABAs and oral corticosteroids, the risk of INP/ED visits, cost, asthma control level, quality of life, and impairment in productivity and activity.
Inhaled corticosteroids were associated with a lower risk of INP/ED visits, and a lower cost if adherence was achieved. When adherence cannot be achieved, LMs may be a reasonable alternative. Combination therapy with ICS plus a long-acting beta-agonist was associated with better or equivalent clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes.
全面评估与各类哮喘控制药物相关的临床、经济和患者报告的结局。
这项观察性研究使用了美国商业健康保险计划的管理索赔数据,纳入了年龄在18至64岁之间、在2003年9月1日至2005年8月31日期间至少开具过1种哮喘控制药物处方的哮喘患者。结局指标包括短效β受体激动剂(SABA)的使用、口服糖皮质激素的使用、住院(INP)/急诊科(ED)就诊次数以及哮喘相关的医疗费用。随机抽取5000名患者的子集,使用小型哮喘生活质量问卷、工作效率和活动障碍问卷以及哮喘治疗评估问卷进行调查。
在56168名符合条件的患者中,823人返回了完整的问卷。与吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)相比,白三烯调节剂(LM)与住院/急诊科就诊几率较低(比值比[OR],0.80;P<0.001)、使用6个或更多SABA药罐的几率较低(OR,0.81;P<0.001)以及年度费用较高(193美元;P<0.001)相关。在依从性患者的亚组分析中,LM与住院/急诊科就诊几率较高(OR,1.74;P=0.04)、使用6个或更多SABA药罐的几率较低(OR,0.46;P<0.001)以及年度费用较高(2加5美元;P<0.001)相关。吸入性糖皮质激素和LM对所有患者报告的结局有类似影响。对于联合治疗,ICS加长效β受体激动剂在SABA和口服糖皮质激素的使用、住院/急诊科就诊风险、费用、哮喘控制水平、生活质量以及生产力和活动障碍方面始终显示出至少相当或更好的结局。
吸入性糖皮质激素与住院/急诊科就诊风险较低相关,且如果实现依从性则成本较低。当无法实现依从性时,LM可能是一种合理的替代方案。ICS加长效β受体激动剂的联合治疗与更好或相当的临床、经济和患者报告的结局相关。