Jhung Michael A, Banerjee Shailen N
Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Sep 15;49(6):949-55. doi: 10.1086/605086.
Surveillance for health care-associated infections (HAIs) using administrative data has received attention from health care epidemiologists searching for efficient means to track infections in their institutions. Several states are also considering electronic surveillance that incorporates administrative data as a means to satisfy an increasing demand for mandatory public reporting of HAIs. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) discharge diagnosis codes have attributes that make them suitable for detecting HAIs; for example, they may facilitate automated surveillance, freeing up infection control personnel to perform other important tasks, such as staff education and outbreak investigation. However, controversy surrounds the appropriate use of ICD-9-CM data in detecting HAIs, and administrative coding data have been criticized for lacking elements necessary for surveillance. Administrative coding data are inappropriate as the sole means of HAI surveillance but may have value to the health care epidemiologist as a way to augment traditional methods.
利用行政数据对医疗保健相关感染(HAIs)进行监测,已受到医疗保健流行病学家的关注,他们正在寻找在其机构中追踪感染情况的有效方法。几个州也在考虑采用纳入行政数据的电子监测,作为满足对HAIs进行强制性公共报告日益增长需求的一种手段。《国际疾病分类,第九版,临床修订本》(ICD-9-CM)出院诊断编码具有使其适用于检测HAIs的属性;例如,它们可能有助于自动监测,使感染控制人员能够腾出时间执行其他重要任务,如员工教育和疫情调查。然而,围绕在检测HAIs时对ICD-9-CM数据的恰当使用存在争议,行政编码数据因缺乏监测所需的要素而受到批评。行政编码数据作为HAIs监测的唯一手段并不合适,但作为增强传统方法的一种方式,可能对医疗保健流行病学家有价值。