Chao M, Wu S, Yan T
Pain Treatment Centre of Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2009 Aug;34(4):522-5. doi: 10.1177/1753193408100961.
This study compared the result of percutaneous release using a miniscalpel-needle and steroid injection in 93 trigger thumbs in 83 patients. The patients were randomly assigned to either miniscalpel-needle percutaneous release (group A) or steroid injection (group B). Visual analogue pain scales and patients' satisfaction were evaluated at baseline, 1 and 12 months. One patient in group A and two patients in group B were lost to follow-up. Forty-four of the 46 trigger thumbs in group A and 12 of 47 trigger thumbs in group B had satisfactory results at 12 months. No digital nerve injury occurred in either group. Percutaneous release with a miniscalpel-needle had a higher success rate than steroid injection.
本研究比较了83例患者93例扳机指采用微型针刀经皮松解术与类固醇注射的结果。患者被随机分为微型针刀经皮松解术组(A组)或类固醇注射组(B组)。在基线、1个月和12个月时评估视觉模拟疼痛量表和患者满意度。A组有1例患者、B组有2例患者失访。A组46例扳机指中的44例和B组47例扳机指中的12例在12个月时获得了满意的结果。两组均未发生指神经损伤。微型针刀经皮松解术的成功率高于类固醇注射。