Eker H Evren, Tuzuner Acar, Yilmaz Ali Abbas, Alanoglu Zekeriyya, Ates Yesim
Department of Anesthesiology and ICM, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
J Anesth. 2009;23(3):347-52. doi: 10.1007/s00540-009-0753-4. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
Arterial cannulation is a common intervention in anesthesia practice. However, the success rates and complications of radial arterial cannulation with 20-G or smaller catheters in patients with atherosclerosis have been underevaluated. The aim of this prospective randomized study was to compare the efficacy of and complications with 20- and 22-G catheters for radial arterial cannulation in atherosclerotic patients.
Thirty patients with atherosclerosis, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) III-IV, undergoing general anesthesia were enrolled in the study. Radial artery cannulation was performed in group 20G (n = 15) with a 20-gauge (20 x 1.1 x 33 mm; flow, 61 ml.min(-1)) catheter and in group 22G (n = 15) with a 22-gauge (22 x 0.9 x 25 mm; flow, 36 ml.min(-1)) catheter. Radial artery systolic blood flow (SBF) and radial artery diameter (RAD) were assessed by a Doppler ultrasound probe before cannulation and 24 h after decannulation for vascular complications. The number of puncture attempts, arterial blood gas samples, and manual flushes; total heparinized solution consumption; duration of cannulation; decannulated radial arterial systolic blood flow; postcannulation RAD; and vascular complications such as occlusion, hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, bleeding, and thrombosis were noted. The Mann Whitney U-test, chi(2) test, and one-sample t-test were used. Values are expressed as medians and quartiles and P < 0.05 was considered as significant.
The number of puncture attempts was greater in group 20G (range, 1 to 4) than in group 22G (range, 1 to 2; P = 0.02). In group 20G patients, postoperative RAD was larger than preoperative RAD (P = 0.02) and postoperative SBF was lower than preoperative SBF (P = 0.03). In group 22G patients postoperative SBF was higher than preoperative SBF (P = 0.03), while there was no significant difference between preoperative and postoperative RAD. The occlusion rate of atherosclerotic radial arteries was 6% with the 22-gauge catheter and 26% with the 20-gauge catheter (P = 0.02).
A 22-gauge catheter for radial arterial cannulation in patients with atherosclerosis provides unchanged postcannulated radial artery diameter, decreases postcannulation complications, and improves the first-attempt success rate.
动脉置管是麻醉实践中的常见操作。然而,在动脉粥样硬化患者中,使用20G或更细导管进行桡动脉置管的成功率和并发症尚未得到充分评估。这项前瞻性随机研究的目的是比较20G和22G导管在动脉粥样硬化患者桡动脉置管中的疗效和并发症。
30例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)III-IV级、接受全身麻醉的动脉粥样硬化患者纳入本研究。20G组(n = 15)使用20号(20×1.1×33 mm;流量,61 ml·min⁻¹)导管进行桡动脉置管,22G组(n = 15)使用22号(22×0.9×25 mm;流量,36 ml·min⁻¹)导管进行桡动脉置管。在置管前和拔管后24小时,使用多普勒超声探头评估桡动脉收缩期血流(SBF)和桡动脉直径(RAD),以观察血管并发症。记录穿刺尝试次数、动脉血气样本采集次数、手动冲洗次数;肝素化溶液总消耗量;置管持续时间;拔管后桡动脉收缩期血流;置管后RAD;以及血管并发症,如闭塞、血肿、假性动脉瘤、出血和血栓形成。采用曼-惠特尼U检验、卡方检验和单样本t检验。数据以中位数和四分位数表示,P < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
20G组的穿刺尝试次数(范围为1至4次)多于22G组(范围为1至2次;P = 0.02)。20G组患者术后RAD大于术前RAD(P = 0.02),术后SBF低于术前SBF(P = 0.03)。22G组患者术后SBF高于术前SBF(P = 0.03),而术前和术后RAD之间无显著差异。22号导管的动脉粥样硬化桡动脉闭塞率为6%,20号导管为26%(P = 0.02)。
对于动脉粥样硬化患者,使用22号导管进行桡动脉置管可使置管后桡动脉直径保持不变,减少置管后并发症,并提高首次尝试成功率。