Suppr超能文献

神经心理评估量表命名测试:收敛效度与区分效度

Naming test of the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery: convergent and discriminant validity.

作者信息

Yochim Brian P, Kane Katherine D, Mueller Anne E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO 80933-7150, USA.

出版信息

Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 Sep;24(6):575-83. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acp053. Epub 2009 Aug 21.

Abstract

This study investigated the convergent and discriminant validity of the naming subtest of the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (NAB), a measure of word-finding. Seventy community-dwelling adults age 60 and above completed the NAB naming test (Forms 1 and 2), the Boston Naming Test (BNT), and other measures of verbal and visual memory, visuoperceptual skills, processing speed, and abstraction. The NAB naming test correlated highly with the BNT and with established measures of memory. The BNT correlated more strongly with education and with sex. The BNT correlated more strongly with a measure of visuoperceptual skills than the NAB naming test did, suggesting that visuoperception is more involved in the BNT. Divergent validity of the NAB naming was demonstrated by a lack of correlations with less-related measures. Findings suggest that the NAB naming test possesses convergent and divergent validity as a measure of word-finding.

摘要

本研究调查了神经心理评估量表(NAB)命名子测验的聚合效度和区分效度,该子测验用于评估词汇查找能力。70名60岁及以上的社区居住成年人完成了NAB命名测试(表格1和2)、波士顿命名测试(BNT)以及其他言语和视觉记忆、视觉感知技能、处理速度和抽象能力的测量。NAB命名测试与BNT以及既定的记忆测量方法高度相关。BNT与教育程度和性别相关性更强。BNT与视觉感知技能测量方法的相关性比NAB命名测试更强,这表明视觉感知在BNT中作用更大。NAB命名测试与相关性较低的测量方法缺乏相关性,证明了其区分效度。研究结果表明,NAB命名测试作为词汇查找能力的一种测量方法具有聚合效度和区分效度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验